What pattern was set for future Chinese dynasties?
Answer - son or closest relative rules after the king dies
Hope That Helps!
General Braddock was a tremendously trained British General who understood implicitly how to fight a war against another European army.
Braddock, however, did not know how to fight against an unconventional force.
And so, during the French and Indian War, General Braddock's greatest weakness was that he did not understand how to fight against the tactics employed by Native American fighters.
Answer:
To achieve general and complete nuclear disarmament.
Explanation:
The goal of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), is to achieve general and complete nuclear disarmament, prevent the spread of making weapons, and to promotes the use of nuclear technology for the purpose of human and societal advancement.
Having signed the Treaty which became effective in 1970, by two groups the Nuclear weapons States and Non-Nuclear Weapons States. The two groups both seek to achieve complete disarmament from the Nuclear Weapons States, and stopping the Non-Nuclear Weapons States from pursuing the idea of making nuclear weapons.
Answer:
The Supreme Court decision that decided the 2000 Presidential Election should go down in history as one of the court's most ill-conceived judgments. In issuing its poorly-reasoned ruling in Bush v. Gore, the court majority unnecessarily exposed itself to charges of partisanship and risked undermining the court's stature as an independent, impartial arbiter of the law. Although the court majority correctly identified constitutional problems in the specific recount proceedings ordered by the Florida Supreme Court, the decision to end all recount attempts did immeasurable damage to the equal protection rights the court claimed to be guarding, since it favored a convenient and timely tabulation of ballots over an accurate recording of the vote. In the controversy that followed this decision, some critics of the majority decision argued that the court had no business taking on Bush v. Gore in the first place, that it should have remained solely within the Florida courts (Ginsburg, J. [Dissent] Bush v. Gore [2000]). This paper will argue that the court was correct to intervene but that umm the resulting decision was flawed and inconsistent, with potentially serious, adverse implications for the Federal judiciary if the court continues to issue rulings in this way.
Explanation:
Studios i think yr welcome
