Explanation:
It promotes tension between states as it creates inequalities with laws and policies. For example, one state may ban gambling to ensure morality while a nearby state allows gambling. There is a conflict between the two as the citizens of the state which outlawed gambling can simply visit the other state to commit what is considered criminal activities in their home state in another state which permits such behavior.
Answer:
I think its A, the us had a surplus but jobs decreased.
Explanation:
You kinda bad tho, i aint into the whole premarital hand holding or none of that but shoot hopefully we equally yoked shawty cuz im tryna get in covenant with you. It took God 7 days to make the world but it'll take you 1 to make mine.
A common misconception is that ruthless dictatorships characterize communism. As part of Fidel Castro's revolutionary reforms, he nationalized<u> </u>Cuba's economy. Compared to Fidel Castro's presidency, today's Cuban government has<u> </u><u>remained much the same</u>
More about Fidel Castro:
At the end of the 20th century, Fidel Castro was the only non-elected executive still in power in Latin America. His personalist leadership style was closer to that of traditional caudillos than to what many would consider to be the hallmarks of a military dictatorship. Although caudillos could be civilians and represented a range of ideologies, "dictatorship" in Latin America typically refers to right-wing leaders who uphold their positions of power by using disproportionately strong military force.
Learn more about Fidel Castro here:
brainly.com/question/3512621
#SPJ1
Fixing unsafe working conditions
Answer: Because each state was looking out for its personal interests in regard to representation in Congress.
Details:
The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise both focused on the representation of states in Congress. Both of these compromises were devised during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787.
- The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states. The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size. The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation. The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature. Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population. In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.
- The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery. For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures. (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.) The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.
