This is a conflict of individual rights versus state protection. For some, the individual rights come first even if it is an attack on others or could put the country at risk. For others, the protection of the country is more important and therefore a person who speaks in a way that threatens the country should and can be silenced.
Schenck v. US is a famous case where the court ruled if the speech presents a danger to the country then the 1st Amendment right is not applicable and can be denied.
Tinker v. Des Moines School District demonstrated when a person peacefully protest even in a school against the government and their decisions (Vietnam War in this case), then the 1st Amendment is applied and the individual rights upheld.
The colonies helped them trade <span>acquisition of resources, and relief from </span>population growth<span>, famine, and drought. </span>
Nazis built extermination camps equipped with huge gas chambers that could kill as many as 6000 human beings in a day. Those labeled as weak would die. They were told to undress for a shower and then led into a chamber with fake shower heads. After the doors were closed, cyanide gas poured from the shower heads. All inside were killed in a matter of minutes.
Yes, I agree that Indian removal from their lands leads to the end of United States' "civilization project".
I agree that the Indian removal in the 19th century marked the end of the United States' "civilization project" because the displacement of Indians from their original regions and used that land for the settlement of Americans leads to the ending of America's civilization.
American Indians were the real owners and inhabitants of United states of America and they had a unique civilization and traditions so we can conclude that Indian removal from their lands leads to the end of United States' "civilization project".
Learn more: brainly.com/question/25824369
