“Preference” is the answer.
<span>Jack and James disagreed about the shirt because of the differences in
their preference. People have their own inclination towards objects and this
could be a result of their personal taste or past experiences. In this case, it
could be that Jack liked the shirt’s fabric or color but James didn’t, that’s
why they disagreed.</span>
Answer:
C. 13.7
Explanation:
First, we look for the unemployees who seek and want a job
100 people
-10 U-16
-10 retired
-63 employeed
- 7 unemployeed but not seeking for job
10 unemployeed who wants and seeks for a job.
<em>unemployement rate: unemployes / labor force </em>
<u>where:</u>
labor force = employees + unemployees
10 + 63 = 73
unemployement rate = 10/73 = 0.136986 = 0.137
Answer:
For Jerry, the opportunity cost of building a fence is not making 2 dishes.
Explanation:
The opportunity cost refers to the benefit you lose when you choose one option over another one. In this case, the opportunity cost for Jerry when he decides to build fences is that he won't be able to make dishes. So, as he can build 7 fences or make 14 dishes in a day, the opportunity cost of building a fence is that he won't be able to make 2 dishes.
Answer:
D) productive efficiency and allocative efficiency but not necessarily equity.
Explanation:
Countries that have a market economy are capitalistic countries and those that favor command economies (centrally planned) are called socialist countries. No country is totally capitalistic (since governments, taxes, regulations, etc., exist), and no country is totally socialist either. But countries are classified depending on which economic system they favor.
Canada favors free markets, and by doing so, it allows market forces to allocate resources. Consumers are free to decide what to buy and at what price, and producers are free to decide what to sell and at what price. Since private actors are free to decide how to allocate resources, they are allocated more efficiently.
But the negative aspect of capitalism is that income and wealth distribution is very unequal.
