The correct answer is :
In The Metamorphosis, Kafka shows us how genres can overlap, making fiction seem like a more versatile form of writing than it might otherwise be. While the story is realistic in its character depictions, it’s based on the surrealistic event of a man changing into an insect. Gregor’s transformation into an insect is also allegorical , since it serves to symbolize the larger themes of the story, such as isolation and alienation.
“Career Clusters" describe a group of careers within the same industry.
It is a group of industries and jobs that are associate by products or skills. There are cluster “pathways” within each cluster, where it corresponds to an assemblage of courses that prepares you for a given career.
I need some points so sorry pls don’t report I will do anything Answer:
Explanation:
Based on the question above, the correct answers go thus:
- 1. People used to deliver goods in ox carts.
- 2. There used to be very few cars in the streets.
- 3. When I was a kid, I used to go sailing with my brother.
- 4. When Mr Smith was young, he used to drive a car without a driving license.
- 5. Jim used to spend his weekend doing part-time job
- 6. People used to believe that the Earth was flat.
- 7. This old man used to work as a librarian in the local library.
- 8. My grandfather used to serve as a captain in the army.
<h3>The modal verb 'used to'</h3>
- The verb 'used to' is applied to express habitual action in the past which no longer takes place.
In conclusion, we can conclude that the correct answers are as given above.
Learn more about Modal verbs here: brainly.com/question/6250914
Answer:
a. Missing conclusion, Our client has an enforceable contract
Explanation:
The argument in this scenario, is a modus ponens and is missing its conclusion. Which in this case would be "Our client has an enforceable contract". It is a modus ponens because it has two pieces of logic that are connected and when one is true so is the other. In this scenario, the contract is in writing which is one piece of logic and is true, therefore, the other piece of logic should be true too.
