1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Hunter-Best [27]
3 years ago
9

According to president fillmore, why did he send commodore perry to japan? to reestablish foreign relations and to improve trade

to learn about and understand japan's laws and culture to help japan improve its government and modernize its culture to help the chinese and dutch gain trading rights in japan.
History
2 answers:
otez555 [7]3 years ago
8 0
The correct answer is <span> to reestablish foreign relations and to improve trade 

He wanted to have a safe haven for American merchants and travelers when they are in the Pacific and he also wanted to Japan  to trade with the United States since Japan was isolated for long and almost nobody had trading rights with them in the area. It was Perry's job to negotiate this and ensure treaties got signed between the two nations.</span>
Alina [70]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

to reestablish foreign relations and to improve trade

You might be interested in
What is a committee?
Zarrin [17]
A. A group of people who meet to discuss a bill
7 0
3 years ago
Nelp
timofeeve [1]

Answer:

I believe it was the Enlightenment.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Do you think that halting warship construction was sufficent step toward preventing another war
Allisa [31]
If this is refering to the Second World War, regardless the creation of the German Bizmark, Hitlers “new deal” program was to restart the German economy. While it did contribute tension between the great powers in Europe, Hitler had youth traning programs and engineered tanks that were far superior than what France and the British had. There was and agreement between the European powers that limited naval guns to less than 13mm (which Germany spat on by equipping the Bizmark with 15mm), to reduce world tension.
3 0
3 years ago
Who were the kulaks in the Soviet Union?
shtirl [24]
The kulaks is a term used to describe <span>Wealthier peasants.
The term is actually used in a derogatory way by Soviet Government because they resist handing over their assets to the soviet union government during the communist era.
Even </span>Vladimir Ilyich Lenin<span> described them as <em>"bloodsuckkers, vampires, plunderers of the people and profiteers, who fatten on famine"</em></span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST HURRY PLEASE How did the issue of prohibition divide the Texas Democratic Party?
shtirl [24]

Answer:

A month after the Democratic conference, Senator Carter Glass of Virginia, a. Democratic leader who received 78 votes for the presidential nomination in 1924, reasserted in his speech of April 5 at Asheville that “prohibition is not a party issue.” The speech was of interest both for its comments on the candidacy of Governor Smith of New York and as a disclosure of the reasoning that prevailed in the Democratic conference.

“Prohibition was not passed by the Democrats or by the Republicans,” Senator Glass said, “but by men of both parties and with no regard for party lines. It was a moral issue, So why in heaven's name should the Democrats make the eighteenth amendment a party issue in the next national campaign, as though electing a wet President would affect the prohibition law? If they do they might just as well take the presidency to the Republicans on a silver platter…They might just as well take their party out and dump it on the scrap heap.”If the Democratic party nominated Governor Smith as “an avowed exponent of the movement to repeal or modify the eighteenth amendment” or should it make prohibition an issue by platform declaration, Senator Glass said, the Democratic candidate would be “badly beaten” and the party “irretrievably wrecked.” He explained at the same time that “the presidency means nothing in the fight for modification,” that the President could not change the Constitution, and that his influence with Congress on such an issue “would be negligible,” In view of these facts Senator Glass believed the modification issue had no place in a presidential platform or a presidential campaign.

Explanation:

Here is just some information to get you started. I copied this off the web, so you cannot use it as direct writing, because that would be copy-right.

I promise you this is not a scam, but the rest of the information or the website I got the information from is linked below.

https://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/document.php?id=cqresrre1927042300

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The puritan founders of massachusetts who described their colony as a "shining city upon a hill" wanted to create a community th
    11·1 answer
  • What acts as a mediator in disputes between unions and employers?
    9·1 answer
  • How did railroads affect the lives of many young people?
    7·2 answers
  • Which phone is better iPhone or galaxy
    5·2 answers
  • What did Presidents Theodore Roosevelt, Calvin Coolidge, Harry S. Truman have in common?
    10·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELPPP PLEASE (WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST)
    10·1 answer
  • Who is da best? one answer is correct
    10·2 answers
  • During the war, both sides made promises of freedom for service to the______.
    6·1 answer
  • True or False: Women used words from this famous American document to draw
    11·1 answer
  • In a system of pure competition, the role of the government is to regulate prices.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!