Answer:
Sentence 2.
Explanation:
Pronoun-antecedent agreement error is characterized as the error when there is an incongruity or disagreement between the pronoun and its antecedent. This error creates a kind of confusion while deriving the meaning of the sentence.
As per the question, <u>sentence 2</u> contains a pronoun-antecedent agreement error because the plural antecedent 'their' does not agree with the singular pronoun 'an enslaved person' which creates a perplexity in the meaning of the sentence. Thus, the sentence could be modified to rectify this error either by altering the pronoun as per the antecedent or vice versa as follows;
'It was common for an enslaved person to stop there on his/her way to the North.'
or
'It was common for the enslaved persons/people to stop there on their way to the North.'
A. King Hrothgar's despair over the inability to defeat Grendel. Is the scene from Beowulf reading that is an example of internal conflict.
Internal conflict in literature is the struggle occurring within a character's mind. The struggle comes about when things the character vies for can't be reached in reality.
In Beowulf, the character with internal conflict is King Hrothgar. He is internally conflicted because he vies for the death of Grendel but he his strategies of killing Grendel all failed. Thus, his goal can't be reached.
Answer:
B is your answer
Explanation:
He attended the U.S. Naval Academy where he won the 1963 and after graduation he served in the U.S. Navy, including a tour of duty in Vietnam.
so its not A
Staubach joined the Dallas Cowboys in 1969 and played with the club during all 11 seasons of his career.
He led the cow boys not Dallas
He led the team to the Super Bowl five times, four as the starting quarterback. He led the Cowboys to victories in Super Bowl VI and Super Bowl XII.
and this proves its not C or D
your answer Is B
Hope this helps! let me know if you have any other questions :)
Answer:
The primary message of Ray Bradbury's short story "The Veldt " concerns the dangers of overreliance on technology. Bradbury presents a cautionary tale of how technology can completely consume a household and drive a significant wedge between parents and children. In this short story, the author is trying to warn us of future dangers of technological innovation by creating an image of a family living in an automated house in the futuristic world. In this story, Ray Bradbury is trying to say that, in the future, technology might take over humanity if nothing is done about it now.
Explanation:
The story talks about this very often if you really read it.
