The financial market history shows that too many securities have statistically significant values.
All zeros that occur among any non-0 digits are significant. as an instance, 108.0097 consists of seven significant digits. All zeros which are on the right of a decimal point and added to the left of a non-zero digit are in no way significant. for example, zero.00798 contained three substantial digits.
The CAPM takes into consideration systematic threat (beta), which is neglected by other go-back fashions, such as the dividend bargain model (DDM). Systematic or market threat is an essential variable due to the fact it is unexpected and, for that reason, frequently can not be absolutely mitigated.
The intention of the CAPM formula is to evaluate whether a stock in all fairness is valued while its chance and the time cost of cash are as compared with its anticipated return. In other phrases, it's far viable, via understanding the personal parts of the CAPM, to gauge whether the present-day price of an inventory is consistent with its possibly go back.
Learn more about significant values here"brainly.com/question/24491627
#SPJ4
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
B. shortage of 1,000 gallons per week
Explanation:
Price = $1
Quantity demanded = 2,000
Quantity supplied = 1,000
Shortage = Quantity demanded - Quantity supplied
= 2,000 -1,000
= 1,000 gallons per week
Therefore, As per question Quantity demand that is 2,000 and quantity supplied that is 1,000. So, in this given case the Quantity demand is more than the quantity supplied. 
Hence, there is shortage of 1,000 gallons per week.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
the government-expenditure multiplier _Is larger than_ the tax multiplier.
Is larger than
Explanation:
Keynesian Cross Model otherwise known as expenditure-output model is used to determine the point where total or aggregate expenditures in the economy are intercept the amount of output produced, i.e equilibrium level of real GDP. In economy, if MPC >0, the government-expenditure multiplier is larger than the tax multiplier.