Passing laws creating courts and collecting taxes are a example of some of the explicit rights given to political bodies by the US Constitution.
Answer:
A) True
Explanation:
1)Post figurative culture : cultural change is gradual, socialization takes place by elder passing knowledge to their kids
2)Configurative culture: cultural change is rapid, adults socialize their children but the peers are more interactive with one another, hence becoming means of socializing for one another
3)Pre figurative culture: cultural change occurring so fast that children might be the ones teaching adults more than they teach them regarding culture knowledge.
dominick was baking cookies for their younger sister and burned their hand.
<h3>What is
baking?</h3>
Baking is a method of cooking that uses dry heat, usually in an oven, but it can also be done in hot ashes or on hot stones. Bread is the most common baked item, but many other foods can be baked. "From the surface of cakes, cookies, and slices of bread to their centers, heat is gradually transferred."
Refined coconut oil is a better choice for baking and cooking due to its mild flavor and high smoke point.
The verb "bake" represents the placement of food in an oven with a single motion. BAKE: Turn the verb "BAKE" into the noun "OVEN" with a double motion.
To know more about baking follow the link:
brainly.com/question/2517160
#SPJ4
Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
False i believe is your answer
