The Connecticut Compromise was putting together 2 plans. The bigger states like Virginia wanted the representation to be based on population, while the smaller states like New Jersey wanted equal representation of all. So the Connecticut Compromise proposed the House of Representations(based on population of states) and the Senate(each state gets 2 representatives). This makes the answer C. a bicameral Congress. Bicameral just meaning two houses. Hope this helps!
3. It is responsible for deciding on whether laws violate the constitution. It does not make laws but rather interprets them. They hold the power to change laws trough judicial review!
4.
Volunteer
Honesty
Trustworthy
Taking responsibility
There are many things to this!
Answer:
naturalistic observation.
Explanation:
Cal believes that a larger percentage of a city’s population will engage in public displays of affection in highly populated cities due to feelings of anonymity when an individual is among a lot of other people. He rides a bus in densely populated New York City for five hours straight, watches the bus riders’ interactions with each other, and unobtrusively counts the number of couples who are holding hands, hugging, or kissing. He then does the same in the sparsely populated city of Rock Falls, Iowa. The research method Cal used is known as naturalistic observation.
As we know that Naturalistic observation is a research method which is used commonly by psychologists and other social scientists. in this technique, it involves observing subjects in their natural environment.
Answer:
This statement is CORRECT: <u>One can keep adding premises to inductive arguments to make them go from strong to weak, then back to strong again, etc.</u>
Explanation:
The inductive reasoning is based on how the the premises are built, in order for them to lead us to a conclusion. This is why building the right premises can lead to a week or strong argument.
The process of builing a inductive argument is based on specific observations or statements into more general aspects. Although strong premises can lead to strong arguments, they do not garantee the conclusion would be true.
In logic, inductive argument it is not classify as valid or invalid, it is strong or weak according to the premises. The premises can be testable for instance, or they can come from observation.
The peer intervention that is least likely to be helpful to troubled teens is moving them to a new school so that they are separated from their at-risk peers.
While it make be a temporary fix, it does not resolve the problem troubled teens are facing.
