A would be your best answer. Hope I helped!
Answer:
The correct answer is D. will result in a multiple times higher decrease in equilibrium real GDP in the short run; however, a tax-rate reduction will increase the automatic-stabilizer properties of the tax system, so equilibrium real GDP would be less stable.
Explanation:
Ricardian Equivalence is an economic theory that suggests that when a government increases expenses financed with debt to try to stimulate demand, demand does not really undergo any change.
This is because increases in the public deficit will lead to higher taxes in the future. To keep their consumption pattern stable, taxpayers will reduce consumption and increase their savings in order to offset the cost of this future tax increase.
If taxpayers reduce their consumption and increase their savings by the same amount as the debt to be returned by the government, there is no effect on aggregate demand.
The fundamental concept of Ricardian equivalence is that it does not matter which method the government chooses to increase spending, whether by issuing public debt or through taxes (applying an expansive fiscal policy), the result will be the same and demand will remain unchanged.
Answer:
The depreciation is $52,500
Explanation:
The formula to compute the depreciation under the straight-line method is shown below:
= 
= 
= $52,500
Under the straight-line method, the depreciation expense should be the same for the remaining useful life. Life of the equipment or machine should always be expressed in years, not in hours.
So, these usage of hours should be ignored.
Answer:
The answer is narrower competitive scope.
Explanation:
In a narrow competitive scope, a business might choose a focus strategy which can be oriented to cost leadership or differentiation. When implementing a focus strategy, the company chooses to only produce goods or provide services to a certain segment of people. In a cost leadership strategy, the business might choose to engage on initiatives that would lead it to be identified from its ability to provide the lowest possible price for its target segment. When choosing a differentiation strategy instead, the company’s competitive advantage would be its ability to provide a wide range of products.
Is this the whole question?
