1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
konstantin123 [22]
3 years ago
14

What are some positives and negatives on loose contructionism

History
1 answer:
Alika [10]3 years ago
3 0
Advantage---Loose constructionists tend to uphold civil rights and liberties. Judicially active, loose constructionist judges such as Ruth Bader Ginsburg tend to dissent in cases which infringe civil liberties such as Salinas v Texas (2013) and agree with rulings that don't e.g. 2015 Same sex rulingAdvantage---Loose constructionists often protect minorities, especially those incompatible with Congress or the executive. This is because loose constructionists are not scared to overturn laws or actions made by Congress or the executive e.g. Brown v Board of EducationDisadvantage---Loose constructionists tend to be judicially active, which has fuelled arguments on the politicisation of the Court. They 'legislate from the bench' by striking down laws as unconstitutional. This is undemocratic and elitist, as they have mandate from the electorateDisadvantage---Loose constructionists tend to be too sensitive to public opinion, which could hamper the neutrality and independence of the Court. However, some public support is necessary to maintain the authority of the Court.
You might be interested in
How did Rosa parks changed the world?
kipiarov [429]

Answer:

she didnt really

Explanation:

it took a whole community, not one person :/

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which man organized A plan to kill President Lincoln
jeka57 [31]
John wilkes booth organized a plan to kill lincoln
3 0
3 years ago
How did Sulla help turn the Roman Republic into the Roman Empire?
Marianna [84]

Answer:

He replaced the elected consuls and the Senate with an empire that could be inherited by members of the ruler's family.

Explanation:

Sulla, not being the Emperor in the modern sense of the word, he, however, possessed sole and unlimited power in the republic. His dictatorship dates back to 83-80 years BC, but the period of his sole rule began, in fact, in the 88th, when Sulla was elected consul. He held this post for eight years against all laws, including the Constitution. Formally, democratic institutions existed under him. There was even a second consul. But this consul was 'technical,' fulfilling the will of Sulla. There was a Senate, which was controlled in the same way by a dictator. The death of Sulla did not lead to major changes. The transition to one-man rule was a matter of time.

4 0
3 years ago
What two military changes helped the british win
DiKsa [7]
They had a new general and created an ambush. Hope I helped :)
7 0
3 years ago
Should there be international rules of engagement regarding the targeting unarmed civilians during wartime ?
dlinn [17]

Answer:

No there should not be. This would cause war and is most likely not allowed in America.

Explanation:

This is because we have laws against this.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The two-party political system returned with the election of _____.
    6·1 answer
  • Was the description of the Balkans as<br> the “powder keg” of Europe justified?
    13·1 answer
  • What did Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak believe Americans would want?
    5·2 answers
  • How did admiral chester nimitz learn of the japanese plans at the battle of midway?
    5·2 answers
  • 2 Points
    11·1 answer
  • Whats the difference between the Missouri compromise and the kansas nebraska act?
    14·1 answer
  • What was Georgia's role in the civil war and how were the people of Georgia impacted
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following actions was the immediate cause of the Civil War?
    15·1 answer
  • Speaker 1: Germany should be made to pay for the damage it has inflicted on
    7·1 answer
  • Which two cases would the Supreme Court be most likely to review
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!