Answer:
The colonial responses to British policies after the French and Indian War can be classified as violent or nonviolent. Hence, we have
Non Violent responses to be the following
Committees of Correspondence: this was formed in 1764, and it was a means of a series of dialogue among patriot leaders throughout the American colonies. The purpose is to unite the colonies in opposition to the British Parliament. It is nonviolent in nature.
Non-Importation Movement: this was formed after the Sugar Act of 1764 and the Stamp Act of 1765. And it is a form of protest by the American colonists for the purpose of boycotting the British goods in an effort to change imperial policy. It involves the abstinence of the American colonists from purchasing or consuming imported tea and other goods. It is nonviolent in nature
Stamp Act Congress: which was conducted in 1765, was the first meeting of the representatives from various American colonies to conduct a unified protest against British taxation, including the petition of the king and Parliament for change the objectionable measures. It is nonviolent in nature
While the violent response is the
Boston Massacre: this occurred in the year 1770. And it was a street fight or open and physical confrontation involving the British soldiers shooting killing several people while being harassed by the American colonists' mob who chose to throw harmful objects like snowballs, stones, and sticks, towards the British soldiers in Boston.
Explanation:
1. Full disarming. Germany basically agreed to have no standing army whatsoever.
2. Germany lost over half of it's territory in the treaty.
3. Germany had to pay A LOT of money in damages + interest.
A type of jurisdiction that state and local trial courts have is : LIMITED JURISDICTION. This jurisdiction can only hear the types of cases specified in the Constitution and federal statues (which is mainly federal crimes, cases rising under the federal law, cases with/against the U.S. government party, and cases involving 'diversity of citizenship."
<span>
if direct democracy means (pure) democracy then it means that every
citizen would get a chance to vote on issues instead of what we have in
the US: a representative democracy where we vote in politicians to do it
for us. A pure democracy would lead to civil war most likely b/c too
many people would be able to disagree, anarchy would be a likely
result,....so i would say D is your answer </span>
Answer:
C. The Great Basin
Explanation:
Outside park boundaries the majority of these streams are used for irrigation; some water evaporates or percolates into the alluvium before reaching the valley bottom. None of the water flows outside of the Great Basin hydrologic basin.
