Trans-Saharan trade routes promoted the growth of powerful trading cities in the time period because they traded valuable items like slaves, gold, and salt, which increased the net worth of the cities and allowed for economic growth that way. Because of the trading, the Trans-Saharan cities could grow
Go back to the old ways, restore monarchs power.
In discussing the stockyards of Chicago, Hemingway wanted to express how conversations about war hide the killing, sadness, rot, and suffering.
We could come to this conversation because:
- Hemingway claims that the stockyards of Chicago are only concerned with presenting the meat, but they hide the slaughter and suffering of the cattle.
- Similarly, conversations about war, present only honor, duty and patriotism, but hide all the suffering and death they cause.
In this case, Hemingway presents the stockyards of Chicago to show how people romanticize and hide the real face of war. For him, this is harmful, as it encourages more wars to happen, just as the stockyards of Chicago want to encourage more meat to be consumed.
You can find more information about what Hemingway meant by citing the stockyards of Chicago at:
brainly.com/question/25766941
The Indian Removal Act was signed into law by President Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830, authorizing the president to grant unsettled lands west of the Mississippi in exchange for Indian lands within existing state borders. A few tribes went peacefully, but many resisted the relocation policy.
I would disagree with the statement "United States vs. Nixon expanded the power of the presidency." In reality, it shrank the power of the president.
In this Supreme Court case, Richard Nixon refused to give up taped conversations he had from the Oval Office. Nixon claimed that this action was protected by the idea of "executive privilege." This meant that because he was president, he had the ability to keep these tapes from going to the courts. However the Supreme Court, in a unanimous vote, stated that the president must give up the tapes. This showed that no person was above the law, including the president. This shows that the presidents are responsible to the courts and do not have special protection in legal cases.
