1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tino4ka555 [31]
3 years ago
13

1. Identify and explain three (3) ways the power of the Federal Government increased over the daily lives of American citizens a

nd I or industry during World War One.​
History
1 answer:
mezya [45]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Despite expansion during Woodrow Wilson’s first term as president, the federal government on the eve of World War I remained small. In 1914, federal spending totaled less than 2 percent of GNP. The top rate of the recently enacted federal individual-income tax was 7 percent, on income over $500,000, and 99 percent of the population owed no income tax. The 402,000 federal civilian employees, most of whom worked for the Post Office, constituted about 1 percent of the labor force. The armed forces comprised fewer than 166,000 men on active duty. Although the federal government meddled in a few areas of economic life, prescribing railroad rates and bringing antitrust suits against a handful of unlucky firms, it was for most citizens remote and unimportant.

With U.S. entry into the Great War, the federal government expanded enormously in size, scope, and power. It virtually nationalized the ocean shipping industry. It did nationalize the railroad, telephone, domestic telegraph, and international telegraphic cable industries. It became deeply engaged in manipulating labor-management relations, securities sales, agricultural production and marketing, the distribution of coal and oil, international commerce, and markets for raw materials and manufactured products. Its Liberty Bond drives dominated the financial capital markets. It turned the newly created Federal Reserve System into a powerful engine of monetary inflation to help satisfy the government’s voracious appetite for money and credit. In view of the more than 5,000 mobilization agencies of various sorts—boards, committees, corporations, administrations—contemporaries who described the 1918 government as “war socialism” were well justified.

During the war the government built up the armed forces to a strength of four million officers and men, drawn from a prewar labor force of 40 million persons. Of those added to the armed forces after the U.S. declaration of war, more than 2.8 million, or 72 percent, were drafted.[3] Men alone, however, did not make an army. They required barracks and training facilities, transportation, food, clothing, and health care. They had to be equipped with modern arms and great stocks of ammunition.

You might be interested in
Which athlete refused military service during the vietnam war on this day in 1967??
muminat
On 1967 of April, with the United States at war in Vietnam, Ali declined to be accepted into the military, saying "I ain't got no squabble with those Vietcong." On June 20, 1967, Ali has indicted draft avoidance, sentenced to five years in jail, fined $10,000 and restricted from boxing for a long time.
4 0
3 years ago
How were traders able to reach the markets of Axum?
bonufazy [111]
<span>the Indian Ocean, the Red Sea, and the Nile River the Indian Ocean, the Red Sea, and the Nile River</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Would you employ a policy of Containment in the world today? How would you ensure that your policy of Containment or Non Contain
borishaifa [10]
Given limited supplies of vaccines, antiviral drugs, and ventilators, non-pharmaceutical interventions are likely to dominate the public health response to any pandemic, at least in the near term. The six papers that make up this chapter describe scientific approaches to maximizing the benefits of quarantine and other nonpharmaceutical strategies for containing infectious disease as well as the legal and ethical considerations that should be taken into account when adopting such strategies. The authors of the first three papers raise a variety of legal and ethical concerns associated with behavioral approaches to disease containment and mitigation that must be addressed in the course of pandemic planning, and the last three papers describe the use of computer modeling for crafting disease containment strategies.

More specifically, the chapter’s first paper, by Lawrence Gostin and Benjamin Berkman of Georgetown University Law Center, presents an overview of the legal and ethical challenges that must be addressed in preparing for pandemic influenza. The authors observe that even interventions that are effective in a public health sense can have profound adverse consequences for civil liberties and economic status. They go on to identify several ethical and human rights concerns associated with behavioral interventions that would likely be used in a pandemic, and they discuss ways to minimize the social consequences of such interventions.

The next essay argues that although laws give decision makers certain powers in a pandemic, those decision makers must inevitably apply ethical tenets to decide if and how to use those powers because “law cannot anticipate the specifics of each public health emergency.” Workshop panelist James LeDuc of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and his co-authors present a set of ethical guidelines that should be employed in pandemic preparation and response. They also identify a range of legal issues relevant to social-distancing measures. If state and local governments are to reach an acceptable level of public health preparedness, the authors say, they must give systematic attention to the ethical and legal issues, and that preparedness should be tested, along with other public health measures, in pandemic preparation exercises.

LeDuc’s fellow panelist Victoria Sutton of Texas Tech University also considered the intersection of law and ethics in public health emergencies in general and in the specific case of pandemic influenza.
3 0
3 years ago
If you were writing a report and wanted to indicate that something is less important, what could you use? Select all that apply.
Tom [10]

<u>Answer:</u>

<u>- small font.</u>

<u>Explanation:</u>

Typically, when writing a report certain captions that are important are written in bold font or large font. However, if you wanted to indicate that something is less important, what could simply write the text in small font. Here's an example below;

'GROSS INCOME: the gross income increased by a record 50%....'

We noticed the less important information were written in small font.

7 0
3 years ago
On the map, what is the present-day name of the island that was home to the village of Aquinnah?
liq [111]
I think the answer is C
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • All of the Tiguas took part in the Pueblo Revolt of 1680.
    9·1 answer
  • When the government sets a price floor on earnings, it is called which of the
    9·1 answer
  • ?????????????someone help
    11·2 answers
  • What reason did the Democratic-Republicans give for opposing the Alien and Sedition Acts?
    15·2 answers
  • He spread Buddhism throughout eastern Asia after he converted to Buddhism and gave up his warrior life.
    13·2 answers
  • In what ways did Kush follow Egypt as a center power, culture, and trade in Africa?
    10·1 answer
  • How might HIV/AIDS hurt the countries that are most severely affected?
    13·1 answer
  • Why do i hate trump...................................
    13·2 answers
  • Each of the three branches of the federal government has distinctive duties. This term describes the duties of the Presidency.
    8·1 answer
  • What can be cut from a person’s budget in order to save money? A) essential expenses B) income from wages C) income from interes
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!