1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nesterboy [21]
3 years ago
5

How do judicial reviews in the majority opinion differ from those in the dissent?

English
2 answers:
ohaa [14]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answer is B. The majority opinion uses lower courts' decision on the case of evidence.

Judicial review is termed as a process which legislative or executive actions are being subjected to review by the judiciary.

Only the judicial review can invalidate government actions and laws which are being incompatible to higher authority.

Law can be invalidated either by violating the constitutional terms or by being unlawful.

Natalija [7]3 years ago
3 0

Judicial reviews in the majority opinion differ from those in the dissent by B. The majority opinion uses lower courts' decisions on the same case as evidence.

<h3>Further explanation </h3>

Judicial review is a process which executive or legislative actions are subjected to review by the judiciary. The other meaning of it is when justices look at the previous courts decisions on the case

Whereas dissent itself is an opinion in a legal case when judges disagree and there are others such as the majority that agrees.  When one or more judges express disagreement with the majority opinion of the members of the court, it is said that they are dissenting.

Judicial reviews in the dissent differ from those in the majority opinion by the dissent depends on previous, similar cases for support. The dissent uses the majority opinion as evidence in a judicial review. While dissenting opinions can be cited in other cases when a change in the law is needed. The dissent uses the majority opinion as evidence of its case.

<h3>Learn more</h3>
  1. Learn more about Judicial reviews brainly.com/question/8548628
  2. Learn more about the case attorneys brainly.com/question/2810347
  3. Learn more about  courts' decisions brainly.com/question/1465434

<h3>Answer details</h3>

Grade:  9

Subject:  English

Chapter:  Judicial reviews

Keywords:  Judicial reviews, the dissent, The majority opinion, courts' decisions, the case attorneys

You might be interested in
The following claim is made in an argumentative essay:
tino4ka555 [31]
Answrs: Part a) "Facts from a documentary.." This is talking about the benefits of artificial organs instead of donated ones.
Part b) "There are several ..." Because it is a sentence that is likely to precede facts. The others are opinions about how something 'SHOULD' be, and aren't presenting facts or claiming something.The first one 3ven says "I think..." which is clearly an opinion.
7 0
3 years ago
Best time to determine voice and tone in writing?
Olenka [21]
The best time to determine voice & tone in writing is when you are in the beginning/middle of the passage/book/article because you will see what the author is going to talk about and then how he feels about it.
7 0
3 years ago
Pick any reading and describe a theme or central idea it has in common with the excerpt above. What issue is Powel commenting on
kobusy [5.1K]

Troy Davis was not allowed to submit to the lie detector to prove his guilt before being executed, as a last resort to avoid lethal injection. His defenders accused the Court of racial discrimination.

Davis´s attorney, Stephen Marsh, has commented that the Georgia department of corrections rejected the request to take the polygraph test. However, until the last minute Davis, did not recognize himself guilty of the murder of police officer Mark McPhail in 1989.

In spite of the doubts about the sentence, lack of real evidence of Davis´s participation in that murder and numerous social protests, the supreme court of the United States rejected the last request of clemency.

In both cases we can infer, although the country fights in order to defeat the racism, is a currently present problem.

8 0
3 years ago
Which pronoun agrees with the antecedent in the sentence? Today nobody brought __________ instrument. A. her B. his or her C. hi
bonufazy [111]
"Today nobody brought his or her instrument" is correct. It is common for people to use "their" in a sentence like this, but "his or her" is the more proper term.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The ___novel takes advantage of readers' fear of attack and trains readers in urban warfare.
kogti [31]

Answer: Invasion

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did the writer of "Counting Small-boned Bodies" involve the reader?
    13·2 answers
  • People who like the idea of a plant that traps, kills, and eats meat love Venus Fly Traps. Despite that terrifying idea, the pla
    11·1 answer
  • How is the authors viewpoint that Toby is intelligent conveyed in the Newsela article Shelter Dog Protects Owner with Epilepsy?
    9·1 answer
  • Diamonds are the hardest substance on Earth. Fact or Opinion Explain: __________________________________________________________
    12·2 answers
  • Help . I tried a hundred times but I can never get this . ‍♂️
    12·1 answer
  • 2 numbers have an absolute value of 16. Which of the two numbers is greater then 13
    6·1 answer
  • Why should police be able to use peoples DNA without consent?
    10·1 answer
  • What is the tone of "An Indian Summer Day on the Prairie"?
    9·1 answer
  • How might the title of a literary work help you examine its purpose?
    10·1 answer
  • How does the author develop his central idea over the course of the text?​
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!