One of the clearest policy manifestations of the "kill the Indian, save the man" concept in western expansion would be those of the boarding school era. These policies removed Native American children from their homes and sent them to far-off boarding schools in an effort to replace (and remove) Native languages, customs, and culture from an entire generation. White policymakers waged a cultural genocide on the generation in an effort to replace their Native traditions with English, Christianity, and other white, Euroamerican values. The earliest boarding schools were actually created by William Pratt, the military official who first coined the "kill the Indian, save the man" motto.
Hope this helps.
Answer:
ARGUMENTS FOR AND AGAINST ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION
For
1. Animals have always been used for experiments that are considered dangerous for humans, e.g lab rats.
This is necessary as some procedures are considered too dangerous for a human to undergo, and therefore, an animal is used to test the process.
2. Animals cannot talk, therefore, have no rights.
Animals, though living, do not have and enjoy the same rights that humans do according to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. This makes it possible to subject them to experiments because no rights are being infringed upon.
Against
1. It is unethical and inhumane to use animals for experiments
Animals have feelings and as such should not be used for unsafe experiments. The practise is inhuman and unethical as it is done without the consent of the animal.
2. Animals are living things and so they have rights.
Animals are living and such should be considered to have rights just as humans do and it would be wrong for any scientist to get any animal of his choice to perform experiments.
Answer: The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 affected the united states because it set the standard for how the USA would bring new states into the Union.
Explanation:
Researchers with a positivist philosophy believe that by being objective and unbiased they can see reality clearly, while researchers with a post positivist philosophy believe that they can only achieve inter subjective agreement about the nature of reality.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The researcher who believe on the philosophy of positivism have a clear sense of seeing facts. They believe that these facts are empirical evidence. They believe that it is the law that exists in general according to which the society is acting accordingly. The knowledge or the views that is based on the intuition or instinct will not be considered by these researchers.
Those views that amends to the views of positivism is called as post positivism. Post empiricism is the other name for this. This is because they will not consider the empirical evidences. They believe that what is observed can differ from the theories, background knowledge of the researcher and their values to a greater extent. They believe only on the reality.
This is an example of a degradation ceremony.
A degradation ceremony is used to degrade the social status of a person with the aim of embarrassing her/him for having violated the rules, it is a way of punishing the person by removing their privileges and rights.
