1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ivolga24 [154]
3 years ago
6

What happened to La Salle after his colony failed?

History
2 answers:
RUDIKE [14]3 years ago
8 0
Long expeditions that led to the establishment of an overland trade route connecting French colonies in Canada with French colonies in Louisiana
otez555 [7]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

La Salle was killed after this happened.

Mutiny! Assasined by his own.

You might be interested in
What’s the answer to the first question???
Svet_ta [14]

Answer:The Legislative Branch. Established by Article I of the Constitution, the Legislative Branch consists of the House of Representatives and the Senate, which together form the United States Congress

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
10 POINTS
netineya [11]

Answer:

Judicial review is the power of the courts to declare that acts of the other branches of government are unconstitutional, and thus unenforceable. For example if Congress were to pass a law banning newspapers from printing information about certain political matters, courts would have the authority to rule that this law violates the First Amendment, and is therefore unconstitutional. State courts also have the power to strike down their own state’s laws based on the state or federal constitutions.

Today, we take judicial review for granted. In fact, it is one of the main characteristics of government in the United States. On an almost daily basis, court decisions come down from around the country striking down state and federal rules as being unconstitutional. Some of the topics of these laws in recent times include same sex marriage bans, voter identification laws, gun restrictions, government surveillance programs and restrictions on abortion.

Other countries have also gotten in on the concept of judicial review. A Romanian court recently ruled that a law granting immunity to lawmakers and banning certain types of speech against public officials was unconstitutional. Greek courts have ruled that certain wage cuts for public employees are unconstitutional. The legal system of the European Union specifically gives the Court of Justice of the European Union the power of judicial review. The power of judicial review is also afforded to the courts of Canada, Japan, India and other countries. Clearly, the world trend is in favor of giving courts the power to review the acts of the other branches of government.

However, it was not always so. In fact, the idea that the courts have the power to strike down laws duly passed by the legislature is not much older than is the United States. In the civil law system, judges are seen as those who apply the law, with no power to create (or destroy) legal principles. In the (British) common law system, on which American law is based, judges are seen as sources of law, capable of creating new legal principles, and also capable of rejecting legal principles that are no longer valid. However, as Britain has no Constitution, the principle that a court could strike down a law as being unconstitutional was not relevant in Britain. Moreover, even to this day, Britain has an attachment to the idea of legislative supremacy. Therefore, judges in the United Kingdom do not have the power to strike down legislation.

Explanation:

nationalparalegal.edu /JudicialReview.aspx

6 0
3 years ago
By 1840, how much cotton did the United States produce per year because of changes in technology? about 3,000 bales about 300,00
Oksanka [162]

As a result of technological advancements, the United States was producing around 300,000 bales of cotton per year by 1840.

<h3>Production of cotton:</h3>

Cotton production is a significant economic factor in the United States, as the country exports the most cotton in the world. After China and India, the United States is ranked third in terms of production.

Cotton fibre is grown and produced almost entirely in the southern and western states, with Texas, California, Arizona, Mississippi, Arkansas, and Louisiana dominating.

Upland cotton accounts for more than 99 percent of cotton grown in the United States, with American Pima accounting for the remainder.

<h3>Maximum production of cotton:</h3>

Cotton production in the United States is a $25 billion-per-year industry that employs over 200,000 people, compared to a growth of forty billion pounds per year from 77 million acres of land spread across more than eighty countries.

Therefore, the correct option is the second one.

Learn more about the production of cotton by the year 1840 here:

brainly.com/question/855610

7 0
2 years ago
What reforms did Woodrow achieve during his presidency?
Aleonysh [2.5K]

woodrow h during the presidency when perform any other person

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write a paragraph of at least 125 words that considers why D.W. Griffith's movie, Birth of a Nation, was so controversial.​
Burka [1]

Answer: “Birth of a Nation”—D. W. Griffith’s disgustingly racist yet titanically original 1915 feature—back to the fore. The movie, set mainly in a South Carolina town before and after the Civil War, depicts slavery in a halcyon light, presents blacks as good for little but subservient labor, and shows them, during Reconstruction, to have been goaded by the Radical Republicans into asserting an abusive dominion over Southern whites. It depicts freedmen as interested, above all, in intermarriage, indulging in legally sanctioned excess and vengeful violence mainly to coerce white women into sexual relations. It shows Southern whites forming the Ku Klux Klan to defend themselves against such abominations and to spur the “Aryan” cause overall. The movie asserts that the white-sheet-clad death squad served justice summarily and that, by denying blacks the right to vote and keeping them generally apart and subordinate, it restored order and civilization to the South.

“Birth of a Nation,” which runs more than three hours, was sold as a sensation and became one; it was shown at gala screenings, with expensive tickets. It was also the subject of protest by civil-rights organizations and critiques by clergymen and editorialists, and for good reason: “Birth of a Nation” proved horrifically effective at sparking violence against blacks in many cities. Given these circumstances, it’s hard to understand why Griffith’s film merits anything but a place in the dustbin of history, as an abomination worthy solely of autopsy in the study of social and aesthetic pathology.

 

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Three of the following techniques are used in mass production which is not
    5·1 answer
  • Did Marbury ever receive his commission and become Justice of the Peace in the District of Columbia?
    10·1 answer
  • Who was the persians war between
    7·2 answers
  • Help please ASAP
    9·1 answer
  • Plzzzz helllpppp!!!!!
    11·1 answer
  • When reading a history textbook _____.
    5·2 answers
  • Which statement about the Tang Dynasty is a factor other than an opinion
    9·1 answer
  • The word Bantu refers to
    15·1 answer
  • Why did most of the Native Americans side with the British?
    15·2 answers
  • 100 points pls help<br> Do you think federal judges should be elected? Why or why not?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!