Answer:
I agree that in some cases that might be the case especi if the game is a gambling game however, I doubt that is the case with most main-line video games. Considering how most games aren’t about gambling and usually have discipline causing you to loose money. For example, in the Mario and Sonic games produced by NIntendo and Sega, if you run into an enemy, you will loose money. Similarly, in the Zelda games there are games you can play and win prizes for around 20 rupees, however these games are challenging and will sometimes scam you.
Explanation:
Was there supposed to be a text?
Answer:
Explanation:
Degrace and/or disgrace(s). Hope that helps!
Answer:
Hello. You did not enter the answer options, but I can help you by showing that the most punctual difference between the "" early bird "" and the "" balancing act "" styles is the way each style performs tasks in relation to the time to complete them.
Explanation:
The "early bird" and "balancing act" styles are forms of time management in relation to the accomplishment of tasks. These two styles are very different. The "early bird" is the style of people who carry out their tasks and obligations as quickly as possible, optimizing time and being free of obligations as soon as possible. On the other hand, the "balancing act" is the style of people who establish a routine with defined times throughout the day reserved for carrying out tasks.
The "balancing act" is not concerned with speed, like the "early bird", but the "early bird" can end up performing tasks without really understanding them because of his concern with speed.
Answer:
If don't have any problem in questoin then why r you asking such type of question which's answer was already given?
The answer is A. The author utilizes free verse due to the structure mirrors easygoing discussion. Free verse is an open type of verse. It doesn't utilize predictable meter examples, rhyme, or some other melodic example. Numerous lyrics formed in free verse in this manner have a tendency to take after the beat of normal discourse.