I think for 2 its goodness...depends on how the person acts in the story and just add some quotes from the story which supports your answer hope this helped
Answer:B
Explanation:<u>From what I read the answer is B.</u>
<u></u>
<u></u>
<u></u>
Please mark Brainliest if this helped
I am a dense thinker; I am constantly being bombarded by feedback from the world around me, and thus am unable to process bulks of information at a time. The small bit of feedback I do maintain, Is usually useless, and therefor is discarded later on. I am in my best environment when I flippantly flop on my bed and slip into a world of my own, comprised of nonsensical 'philosophy'. I truly enjoy this because I have no pressure to acknowledge the chaotic world around me, or to intelligently accomplish anything. Of course, this also means that the majority of my time is spent dozing off and/or being a sheep: unable to think for myself and following people who decide what is right for me. Sometimes, when I put real effort into my activities, I accomplish more than I thought I could. However, effort is hard, so I try to avoid it.
Answer:
The conversation you write must sound natural for the characters.
Explanation:
More natural conversations between characters make your writing more fun to read. Reading a dialogue that sounds like it could actually happen engages the reader, and creates an investment in the characters themselves. Think of it this way, would you rather watch a movie with good acting or bad acting?
The script, or text of a play contains B. dialogue and stage directions.
The author writes stage directions so both the actors and the audience know what is going to happen and to set the stage better. A play without dialogues (or monologues) is not possible, is it?
