Answer:
Akbar was secular and Aurangzeb was not secular
Explanation:
Akbar was secular and he allowed people of all religion to practice their religious rituals without any fear in his reign. This was evident from the Akbar decision to allow his Hindu wife Jodha to continue being Hindu.
While on the other hand Aurangzeb was not secular and he forcefully converted people of other religion to adopt Islam forcefully
<span>Leonor Lopez he was a Spanish nobleman</span>
Indirect democracy means that people don't vote themselves, but that they choose representatives to vote for them.
It's typically more efficient than direct democracy, because less people need to directly participate - only the representatives.
however, the disadvantage is that some people's voices won't be heard - so the correct answer is B, for example when their representatives are not aware of them.
