Answer:
There was very little difference. Both ran off of dictatorship. Napoleon did lead with heavy manipulation, while Mr. Jones controlled them by just him having human authority. Both cut back rations often, and over worked the animals with out breaks. But, Napoleon often had animals do his dirty work (such as the dogs being the executioners along with being body guards) while Mr. Jones only made the animals work for him.
In the end, Napoleon equaled no better than Mr. Jones if not maybe even worse.
Explanation:
Answer:
2nd
Explanation:
All the others are opinion-based.
They entered, covered with snow, their helmets sprinkled with a creamy-looking froth, which gave them the appearance of meringues.<span> They seemed utterly worn out.
</span>The six men watched her movements with hungry eyes. <span>They had placed their rifles and helmets in a corner and waited for supper, as well behaved as children on a school bench.</span>
I’ll mark brainliest if correct
Select the correct answer.
What argument does the author counter in this excerpt from Thomas Paine's Common Sense?
I have heard it asserted by some, that as America has flourished under her former connection with Great Britain, the same connection is
necessary towards her future happiness, and will always have the same effect. Nothing can be more fallacious than this kind of argument.
We may as well assert that because a child has thrived upon milk, that it is never to have meat, or that the first twenty years of our lives is to
become a precedent for the next twenty.
OA.
Britain provides ample welfare to all her colonies, including America.
OB.
The colonists do not benefit from their alliance with Britain.
OC.
Britain does not provide adequate resources for the growing colonies in America.
OD
The colonies continue to depend on Britain for protection and governance.