Answer:
survival intelligence and adaptation to the wild circumstances
Explanation:
Answer: Feudalism as a fundamental socio-economic relationship of the Middle Ages.
Explanation:
Feudalism implied a hierarchy in which all social classes were included, and it functioned for centuries during the Middle Ages. At the top of the "feudal pyramid" was a king who allocated land to nobles or feudal lords, on that land worked serfs who took part of the income from the land for themselves, and in case of war, the feudal lord, in turn, had to assign a certain number of soldiers. Was a larger feudal lord had to provide a larger number of majors). The disappearance of the feudal system occurred with the emergence of the first economic relations, i.e., the emergence of private property; the king no longer had to allocate land to have an army but could hire and pay from the state treasury. Fundamental changes in economic relations that are still relevant today occurred during the XIX. century. Namely, this is the Industrial Revolution period when large capitalists appear, who pay taxes to the state for their activities, and economic relations are still in force today.
Answer:
C.S. Lewis states that moral law is not a simply convention . He says "there are two reasons for saying it belongs to the same class as mathematics. The first is, as I said in the first chapter, that though there are differences between the moral ideas of one time or country and those of another, the differences are not really very great — not nearly so great as most people imagine — [...].The other reason is this. When you think about these differences between the morality of one people and another, do you think that the morality of one people is ever better or worse than that of another? Have any of the changes been improvements? If not, then of course there could never be any moral progress. Progress means not just changing, but changing for the better. If no set of moral ideas were truer or better than any other, there would be no sense in preferring civilized morality to savage morality, or Christian morality to Nazi morality."
Then the Law of Human Nature is compared as a standard or universal truth: "he moment you say that one set of moral ideas can be better than another, you are, in fact, measuring them both by a standard, saying that one of them conforms to that standard more nearly than the other. But the standard that measures two things is something different from either. You are, in fact, comparing them both with some Real Morality, admitting that there is such a thing as a real Right, independent of what people think, and that some people's ideas get nearer to that real Right than others."
Reference: Lewis, C.S. “Some Objections .” PBS, Public Broadcasting Service, 1952
Answer:
Parochial Political Culture
Participatory Political culture
Subject Political Culture.
