When they were at war again we were trading with both of them. They both attacked our ships because they didnt want to have the other profiting off us. So France started attacking ships enroute to britian and Britain started attacking ships enroute to france. This practically destroyed americans trade. The war between them had americans split. Some wanted to support france while others wanted to support britain. But the president George Washington decided something else. He decided that he would rather stay neutral in the war. This angered france who had expected our help since we had become a nation mainly thanks to them. They had expected our support. This triggered the XYZ event which led to the french representative demanding big bribes to keep the the peace. That how the old famous saying Not a sixthpence was born
please give me branlyist i only need 3 more to up
Answer:
The comparison between Portuguese and Dutch trade in Asia is done below
Explanation:
Dutch
- Monopoly of spice trade
- possessed trading post empires
- Later practiced colonial form of domination instead of trading post empires
- Attention geared towards Indonesia
- Attempt to control the shipping business
Portuguese
- Unrest in trade due to less value placed on European trade goods
- Raiding of ships and getting away it in order to circumvent monopolistic behaviors
- The Muslims who were monopolistic in spice trade thru setting up of post empires and seizing it force.
Answer:
Explanation:The dawn of the twentieth century found the region between Kansas and Texas in transition. Once set aside as a permanent home for indigenous and uprooted American Indians, almost two million acres of Indian Territory had been opened to settlement in 1889. Joined with a strip of land above the Texas Panhandle, the two areas were designated "Oklahoma Territory" by an act of Congress the following year. Subsequent additions of land surrendered by tribal governments increased the new territory until it was roughly equal in size to the diminished Indian Territory. Land was the universal attraction, but many white pioneers who rushed into Oklahoma Territory or settled in Indian Territory hoped for a fresh start in a new Eden not dominated by wealth and corporate power. Freedmen dreamed of a new beginning in a place of social justice where rights guaranteed by the Constitution would be respected. Most Native Americans, whose land was being occupied, had come to realize the futility of their opposition to the process that would soon unite the two territories into a single state. A few Indians, most wedded to tribal traditions, simply ignored a process they could not understand and refused to participate in an allotment of land they had once been promised would be theirs "forever."
The birth of the new state occurred in an era of protest and reform. Populist and Progressive currents merged to sweep reform-minded Democrats to an overwhelming victory in 1906 in the selection of delegates to a Constitutional Convention tasked with forging Indian and Oklahoma territories and the Osage Nation into a single state. The constitution drafted at the convention in Guthrie in 1906–07 was not as "radical" as Pres. Theodore Roosevelt suggested, but it did reflect its authors' belief that the will of the people, not powerful corporations, should determine state policy. A series of provisions, including a corporation commission, popular election of many state officials, initiative and referendum, preferential balloting for U.S. senators, a single term for the governor, a weak legislature, and inclusion of details in the constitution normally enacted by statute, reflected the founding fathers' conviction that corporate influence on state government should be held in check.
It could be, but why in competition
I'm pretty sure it was the horse bc native americans no longer traveled on foot for long distances. instead, they had the ability to travel using horses which was faster and more efficient
