Answer:
Behavioral
Explanation:
In psychology, moral development has to do with the understanding of morality that takes place since childhood and until adulthood. According to different models, we go through different stages in our moral development as we grow older.
However, moral development has two different aspects:
- Cognitive: Has to do with our thoughts and beliefs about things and their morality.
- Behavioral: Has to do with our actions regarding rules and morality, it's the way we act in moral dilemmas.
In this example, Professor Jones is studying how a person responds to the temptation to violate moral rules such as lying and cheating, we can see that <u>both lying and cheating refer to behaviors,</u> therefore, he is focusing on the behavioral aspect of moral development.
Answer:
Their problems were low wages and unsafe working conditions.
Explanation:
In the late 1800s, workers organized unions to solve their problems. ... First, workers formed local unions and later formed national unions. These unions used strikes to try to force employers to increase wages or make working conditions safer.
In simple definition followership means:
1. the ability or willingness to follow a leader.
2. a group of followers or supporters; following.
Followership is the actions of someone in a subordinate role. It can also be considered as a specific set of skills that complement leadership, a role within a hierarchical organization, a social construct that is integral to the leadership process, or the behaviors engaged in while interacting with leaders in an effort to meet organizational objectives.[1] As such, followership is best defined as an intentional practice on the part of the subordinate to enhance the synergetic interchange between the follower and the leader.
In organizations, “leadership is not just done by the leader, and followership is not just done by followers.” [2] This perspective suggests that leadership and followership do not operate on one continuum, with one decreasing while the other increases. Rather, each dimension exists as a discrete dimension, albeit with some shared competencies.[3]
The study of followership is an emerging area within the leadership field that helps explain outcomes. Specifically, followers play important individual, relational, and collective roles in organizational failures and successes.[4][5][6] “If leaders are to be credited with setting the vision for the department or organization and inspiring followers to action, then followers need to be credited with the work that is required to make the vision a reality.”[7]
The term follower can be used as a personality type, as a position in a hierarchy, as a role, or as a set of traits and behaviors. Studies of followership have produced various theories including trait, behavioral attributes, role, and constructionist theories in addition to exploring myths or misunderstandings about followership.
Based on the following choices above, the answer is enhance their self-concept. It is because an individual who mature early will likely have a development within herself in which makes her self-concept to be enhanced or to develop in a way that her individuality is changing.
The King overstepped our rights when he began to unfairly tax us for the French and Indian War. He mistrusted us too and sent Lobster Backs (or red coats) to towns to avoid a rebellion. Most of them were assigned to Boston. (Where most of our patriots lived). Not only did the soldiers take up room in our cities... but they were RUDE. When the Boston Massacre happened they unfairly slaughtered our Whigs. (We may have stretched the truth there a little bit using propaganda but STILL.) After all and all we sent the king one more chance to avoid war- but he ignored the paper and didn't even LOOK at it.
