The four major players are: Hamilton, Burr, Nathaniel Pendleton, William Van Ness.
Hamilton was the first secretary of treasure and he was against Burr during the duel. Burr was the Vice President to Jefferson and he was against Hamilton. Nathaniel Pendleton was a lawyer and Hamilton's second. William Van Ness was a lawyer and Burr's second.
Burr arrived first on the ground as had been previously agreed. When Genl Hamilton arrived the parties exchanged salutations and the Seconds proceeded to make their arrangments. There’s this musical that’s been getting some attention lately, Hamilton. Maybe you’ve heard of it. In the musical, Burr announces that there are 10 things you need to know about the duel, though actually he cites plenty more.
To learn more about Hamilton here
brainly.com/question/1523962
#SPJ4
No, Krakuer does not cite any evidence regarding his analysis about alex relationship with his father.
He believe that alex just got stuck in the middle of conflict between McCandless and the father. But, he is just basing the assumption on the relationship between McCandless and the father without knowing for sure how alex behave to the conflict.
To reconstruct the and give free slaves the right to vote and that anyone born in the US is a US citizen the Supreme Court ruled that the 14 amendment speaks to the Bill of Rights and pretty and pretty much defines the freedom of speech , free press , no establishment of religon , and the right to counsel also secures the rights to state action this amendment represents the Constitution in a nut shell .
Answer:
I'm from From Jhapa Nepal
Answer:
Overestimate, availability bias
Explanation:
Availability bias:
It is a phenomenon in which an individual makes the judgment on the base of biased towards the events. The individual easily comes under the influence of the event due to the past availability of the information. For example, if something occurred and the same thing occurred in the past with our strong emotions then we analyze the event with the availability of the experience in the past. The judgment will be biased because of the cloudiness of the past the experience due to which the recent event takes the weight.