Answer:
Machiavelli claims that a leader must find a balance between a temperate and a cruel attitude to be successful. He makes a very effective argument. First, he uses deductive reasoning by stating a conclusion that he uses to prove his point. He says that if a leader is not cruel, his subjects will rebel and no one will obey the law. Second, his evidence is compelling. Machiavelli uses historical examples to support his ideas, which are clear and interesting to read. Finally, he uses sophisticated diction, creating a serious tone that provides a sense of authority. His reasoning, evidence, and diction all work together to support his claim, making his argument both horrifying and effective.
Explanation:
Answer:
Henry Clay wrote the 5 bills of the Compromise of 1850
John Brown raided Harpers Ferry
Stephen Douglas introduced the Kansas-Nebraska Act
Harriet Tubman participated in the Underground Railroad
Explanation:
I knew from mind that Harriet Tubman did the Underground Railroad things and the rest i looked up sorry :( i also needed help
<span> The fourth amendment/Amendment IV prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and requires search warrants.</span>
Answer: they belived the Church of England needed a reform and both believed in original sin and the literal interpretation of the bible as God's word
Explanation:
Both the Pilgrims and the Puritans were English Protestants who believed that the Church of England was in need of reform. Although both were strict Calvinists, they differed in approaches to reforming the Church of England. The Pilgrims were more inclined to separate from the church, while the Puritans wanted to reform the church from within. The Pilgrims were the first group of Puritans to seek religious freedom in the New World. As strict Calvinists, members of both groups believed in original sin, predestination and the literal interpretation of the Bible as God’s word.
