The basic difference is for whose benefit the Tax went to.
During the British revolution, the Tax that being paid went to the Federal budget of the British Government in order to fund their wars.
On the other hand, if the civilians do not pay the taxes for their own taxes, they pretty much do not contribute to the infrastructure development of their own nation.
Let's take a look at some command economies: today: North Korea
In the past: The Soviet Union.
We can see that in both cases the countries failed to provide enough food and supplies for their citizens, so one way that command economies influence the citizens of the countries that had them was by inducing hunger. (the same is not true of mixed economies, or not always true).
The main cause for the French and Indian War was competition for land/fur/resources.
Option 1
<u>Explanation</u>:
This war is better called as a seven years war. The war between French and India was due to the series of conflicts over hegemony in North America. There are 3 reasons for the war between the French and India. One is economic, as North America was full of riches if one could hold of this place. It could have all the resources. Another is there numerous alliances. Both French and English had a lot of native alliances due to which due to internal disputes between their alliances cause conflicts between French and India. And another reason was Ohio territory who could claim it.
Americans did not want to be taxed by those they did not elect. "no taxation without representation".
False, the most populated continent is Asia
