1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ioda
3 years ago
7

How long ago was the indus river valley civilization?

History
1 answer:
Sedaia [141]3 years ago
3 0
<span>1700 BCE was when the indus river valley civ was ended </span>
You might be interested in
Will mark branniest (*don’t know how to spell) Please help me
Vanyuwa [196]
Answer: B. 6x^2 + 6y^2 = 144

Explanation:
Plug each equation into a graphing calculator, find the one that matches the graph shown.

8 0
3 years ago
Ohhhhhh! I have a Brainliest
andrezito [222]
D and A I think I might be wrong

6 0
3 years ago
2. What reasons does Saladin give for retaking Jerusalem? What arguments does he use to inspire his
julia-pushkina [17]

Answer:

Pt. 1: They have to take out their enemies and gain power just like many other groups already have.

Pt. 2: Pope and Saladin believe that it is god's will to fight Jerusalem.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Would it have been better if Prometheus never came and gave the people fire? Was humanity better off because it had fire and civ
postnew [5]
They were better off. Without the discovery of the uses of fire, mankind would not be here. Fire led to the rapid increase of newer, more advanced tech, such as a sword instead of a club.
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
while this country never formally joined to Axis Powers or joined World War ll, it did form an alliance with Germany and did in
Otrada [13]

Axis would have probably wiped out most of its West-European enemies. Canada would probably have tried to fight against America and failed, getting its armies crushed, or stayed on the defensive. Hitler would probably have had more troops and peace of  mind tromping around around the Soviet grounds, and would have lost a lot less manpower than when the US actually went to war in the real WWII. Since I'm assuming that in this hypothetical scenario, the US was allied with Japan, Pearl Harbor never happened. Japan and America would both have undisputed hold of the Pacific, with America's (unsunken) battleships and aircraft carriers along with Japanese suprbattleships like the Yamato, and dual force garrisons on the pacific islands. America might have invaded the lower Americas as well, if it didn't stop at securing the border. Mexico might have joined in to help the Axis powers. Then Hitler would still turn on Stalin, still loose an ungodly portion of his army in Russia, get driven back, and start losing the war in the European theatre, at least until axis forces come to back him up, primarily in the form of American Axis soldiers. Then America would lose many men in the Russian front, until it finally invaded Russia somehow (probably after many years and the combined nuclear armaments research being conducted by the US and Nazi Germany.) After invading Russia, Hitler will grow pompous and attempt to invade America with his already weakened force. He would attempt to destroy the remaining American troops in the European/Asian Theatre. America and Japan would probably ally with each other to maintain their hold of the Pacific, and fight back, with a smaller scale D-Day happening (Only made up of Americans) being launched from the invaded and annexed New American Britain or New German Britain or whatever. America would invade Germany, while Germany cannot invade America (see other Quora posts for explanations on why it is virtually impossible to invade America). America ends up with territories and troops spread all across the Pacific, Africa, Russia, Europe, and Asia, with probably troops in Canada and Mexico as well. Consequently, the troops will be brought down through the freedom fighters and rebellions that will ultimately pop up. Hitler shoots himself in the bunker as well.

Lots of bloodshed. Thank god it didn't happen this way! A lot of countries would be utterly in ruins after this version of the World War, not just Poland and Germany and England and Russia and Korea and China (etc.), but who knows how many more countless places. Not to say that I am okay with WWII happening how it did anyway, since it was extremely bloody as well, but... the real WWII was a giant bloody clash of death. This hypothetical one wouldn't have been a clash. It would have been a giant cluster that resulted in possibly twice or three times as many deaths, mostly more civilian deaths in general.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Citizens of the United states can lose their natural right to liberty if they
    8·2 answers
  • PLZ HELP ASAP
    15·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of having competing political parties?
    15·1 answer
  • What was the reason for Italy's wealth?
    12·1 answer
  • in what ways do u think the nation changed between Washington and inauguration and the election of 1800?
    6·1 answer
  • What were some of the difficulties the colonists of Jamestown encountered in the first few years? Check all of the boxes that ap
    15·2 answers
  • According to most white people in the 1840s, what would happen if siavery were
    14·1 answer
  • It has been suggested that Senators actually appoint federal district judges, and Presidents
    7·1 answer
  • Each sentence below uses an academic or content vocabulary word shown in italics. Read the sentence. If the vocabulary word is u
    11·2 answers
  • During the Cold War, what was the main issue concerning the U.S.?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!