At the level of 0.05% significance we can not reject the psychologist's claim. His claim is supported.
Explanation:
When a researcher undertakes a project to do research firstly he takes some random samples. Sample is definite a small group of numbers assume to represent the whole population. Suppose a researcher wants to do research on married couples to find the trend of divorce among them. For that reason he will randomly choose some of the couples and will draw conclusions that inter personal communication reduce the chances of divorce.
Now to establish this experiment as a fact he needs to go through a test of level of significance. Where he will get the result that his statement is established or rejected.
Just. because formal battles have ended, does not mean both sides will accept the outcome. Prejudice and need for cheap labor was still deeply ingrained.
The confederate south had been devastated by the Civil War. Money and law enforcement from Union military would be required., for years! The US treasury did not make enough budgeted funds available for equitable reconstruction. Blocking pro-freedmen legislation.
Many of former confederate states would send pro-slavery/anti negro representatives to US House and Senate.
Political squabbling would continue with the compromise of 18xx would remove federal troops. Dominant white racist ideals would prevail. Banks not loaning to freed slaves, only at unreasonable high interest rates, would reduce business and land ownership.
I'm not positive what the question is asking but during that time period Rome was a Republic, which is similar to a democracy
