Answer:
The Court has held that practically all the criminal procedural guarantees of the Bill of Rights—the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments—are fundamental to state criminal justice systems and that the absence of one or the other particular guarantees denies a suspect or a defendant due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment.1077 In addition, the Court has held that the Due Process Clause protects against practices and policies that violate precepts of fundamental fairness,1078 even if they do not violate specific guarantees of the Bill of Rights.1079 The standard query in such cases is whether the challenged practice or policy violates “a fundamental principle of liberty and justice which inheres in the very idea of a free government and is the inalienable right of a citizen of such government.”1080
The congress dictates the number of justices
Considering the legal practice and standards, it is <u>false</u> that in a case involving internet transactions, jurisdiction is proper only when the defendant conducts substantial business in the jurisdiction online.
<h3>What is Jurisdiction in online transactions?</h3>
Jurisdiction online transaction is a legal issue that seeks to solve or justify court jurisdiction over a case or dispute involving a foreign defendant.
In this case, the normal principle state that having a foreign defendant access a website is not satisfactory to establish jurisdiction.
Therefore, for a court to justify exercising jurisdiction over a foreign defendant in Internet-based transactions, there must be multiple contacts in addition to the accessibility of a website.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "False."
Learn more about Jurisdiction of court here: brainly.com/question/10377896
