I’m not too sure but it may be C.
Answer:
It is the duty of Congress to have hearings in order to confirm a Supreme Court Justice nominee (as stated in the Constitution). This exclusive power rests on the U.S. Senate. The consensus, however, may be different and may vote against a nominee. Political parties within the Senate generally get in the way of who will vote and who won't, and vice-versa.
Explanation:
For example, Merrick Garland (former President Obama's nominee) was not given a hearing. Furthermore, Congress failed to perform the duties to have a hearing and decide whether to vote or deny a nominee. This is an example of how they refused to even vote on him. This is not the way government should operate.
Answer:
<u><em>True</em></u>
Explanation:
<em>The Telecommunications Act of 1996</em> was the first act to overhaul the telecommunication law. The act was passed to let anyone enter the communications business, to allow competition in communications business and implement single layer of regulation in the federal level.
It was passed by congress in January 1996, and president Bill Clinton signed it in February 1996. It allowed the companies who were serving the local market to enter the long distance market.
This deregulation broke the monopolies within the local exchange areas. The new regulations forced the local barriers to share the communications facilities with the competitors and ensured that each company was treated in an equitable and fair manner.
Answer:
WEE WOO WEE WOO WEE WOO WEE WOO WEE WOO WEE WOO WEE WOO
Explanation:
