Constantinople was able to fight back against the numerous
invasion attempts before 1453, but with each fight it got weakened. This
resulted in the fall of Constantinople in the year 1453, at the hands of
Ottoman Turks. Constantinople was not only fighting against the Turks, but also
against the fellow Christians. The Turks did not care about the Muslim population
living in Constantinople. Constantinople never grew stronger with the
resistance they put up against the several external aggressors. If that has
been the case, then they would not have been defeated by the Ottoman Turks.
The answer is "Hypothesis".<span>
"Hypothesis" is the term This is a
prediction of the outcome of scientific processes based on analysis. Or more
precisely this is a testable prediction.
<span>When a hypothesis is established there are ways to test that
hypothesis like "Experiment"</span></span>
Answer:
Considering these questions:
1. What if Napoleon had never been born? (In what ways would history have been different? Do you think someone else would have done what Napoleon did? Why?)
<em />
<em>a. If Napoleon was never born, someone else would have been born to undertake his roles but not in exact ways because nature abhors vacuum.</em>
<em>b. History would have been different because no two persons are the same and are created to perform exactly the same roles in nature. They might undertake similar ventures but not exactly the same at the given time.</em>
<em>
c. Yes someone else would have done what Napoleon did but in his own way. As earlier said no two persons are the same with the same mission. </em>
2. The French Revolution began as a struggle for the rights of the people against a single ruler with all the power. It ended by giving all power to another single ruler. Why do you think that happened?
Answer: It happened because the Public cannot be King, it is only a person that shall be given the people's mandate to lead the others. The only thing the people abhor or do not tolerate is high-handedness of a ruler not a leader. No leader is an absolute, that was why we should not allow too much power to be concentrated in an individual because of abuse. L<em>ord Acton said " Power corrupts but absolute Power corrupts absolutely."</em>
Answer:
Section 2 of Article Two lays out the powers of the presidency, establishing that the president serves as the commander-in-chief of the military, among many other roles. This section gives the president the power to grant pardons.