Answer:
1. of the heart and blood vessels = cardiovascular
2. to proceed along a specific course of action=pursue
3. a little world= microcosm
4. any of a number of side or respects= facet
Answer: Elizabeth Van Lew was a successful spy because society did not expect a lady to serve in that role.
Explanation:
The central idea that is implied in this paragraph is that Elizabeth Van Lew was a successful spy because society did not expect a lady to serve in that role.
According to the passage, because Elizabeth Van Lew was a lady worked in her advantage as people didn't suspect her. It was believed that a lady wouldn't become a spy. It was believed that a lady should manage her servants, prepare parties and support her husband but not a spy and this worked in Van Lew's favor.
<h3>The Declaration of Independence is perhaps the most masterfully written state paper of Western civilization. As Moses Coit Tyler noted almost a century ago, no assessment of it can be complete without taking into account its extraordinary merits as a work of political prose style. Although many scholars have recognized those merits, there are surprisingly few sustained studies of the stylistic artistry of the Declaration. This essay seeks to illuminate that artistry by probing the discourse microscopically--at the level of the sentence, phrase, word, and syllable. By approaching the Declaration in this way, we can shed light both on its literary qualities and on its rhetorical power as a work designed to convince a "candid world" that the American colonies were justified in seeking to establish themselves as an independent nation. The text of the Declaration can be divided into five sections--the introduction, the preamble, the indictment of George III, the denunciation of the British people, and the conclusion. Because space does not permit us to explicate each section in full detail, we shall select features from each that illustrate the stylistic artistry of the Declaration as a whole. The introduction consists of the first paragraph--a single, lengthy, periodic sentence: When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. Taken out of context, this sentence is so general it could be used as the introduction to a declaration by any "oppressed" people. Seen within its original context, however, it is a model of subtlety, nuance, and implication that works on several levels of meaning and allusion to orient readers toward a favorable view of America and to prepare them for the rest of the Declaration. From its magisterial opening phrase, which sets the American Revolution within the whole "course of human events," to its assertion that "the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God" entitle America to a "separate and equal station among the powers of the earth," to its quest for sanction from "the opinions of mankind," the introduction elevates the quarrel with England from a petty political dispute to a major event in the grand sweep of history. It dignifies the Revolution as a contest of principle and implies that the American cause has a special claim to moral legitimacy--all without mentioning England or America by name. Rather than defining the Declaration's task as one of persuasion, which would doubtless raise the defenses of readers as well as imply that there was more than one publicly credible view of the British-American conflict, the introduction identifies the purpose of the Declaration as simply to "declare"--to announce publicly in explicit terms--the "causes" impelling America to leave the British empire. This gives the Declaration, at the outset, an aura of philosophical (in the eighteenth-century sense of the term) objectivity that it will seek to maintain throughout. Rather than presenting one side in a public controversy on which good and decent people could differ, the Declaration purports to do no more than a natural philosopher would do in reporting the causes of any physical event. The issue, it implies, is not one of interpretation but of observation.</h3>
Answer:
person versus person is not......
Explanation:
I don't know what you are looking for but.....
person versus peeson is a conflict that happens between two characters that do not agree with something.
It is not person verses self because that is an internal conflict that happens within someone.
It is not person verses society because that has to do with whether you agree or disagree with a socities cultural norm.
It is not person verses nature because it has to do with someone going on with nature, which you can not control, like a volcanic eruption.
Hope this was helpful somewhat
That sentence would be (c) This diner is great because they always seat people quickly.
Who is they? They is typically used to refer to a group of people, however the only noun before it is the diner. While most automatically assume "they" refers to the servers, it is not explicitly stated in the sentence, which could be confusing.
