Answer:
building a new government, handling the financial affairs of the new country, finding good relations with Great Britain and signing treaties with Indian tribes
Answer:
fixed interval
Explanation:
A fixed interval scheme refers to a reinforcement scheme in which an activity is rewarded only when a certain period of time is over. In the fixed interval scheme, there is a large amount of activity always occurring simultaneously at the end of a time interval. This kind of scam is very common in games, especially slot machines that reward gamblers with cash.
Answer:
Affirmative Action isn't ethical. There is no real theory that justifies it.
Explanation:
I doubt that this reasoning is based on any rational theory. In the first place, you can't repay the sins of a past generation by placing burdens on a generation living presently. That simply requiring one group of people to suffer for what another group did. And, anyway, the theory doesn't work for white people. When whites suffer enslavement, as they have in the past, at the hands of Mongols, or at the hands of Arabs, then nobody raises the subject of Affirmative Action. In other words, whatever "theory" is being used, isn't being used consistently. And that means that the ostensible justification for Affirmative Action isn't the real reason that it is used.
The Bering Strait Land Bridge is a good example of this. During the Ice Age, humans from Asia migrated to what now is called North America in order to thrive in new lands, with new farming style.
Answer:
Negligence and wrongful use of equipment, the case would be dismissed
Explanation:
A microwave is a tool used to reheat food. Putting wet underwear into it is not only wrongful but it also denies the purpose of the equipment. The microwave company is only responsible for any damage that occurred with the rightful and correct usage of the machine.
Greg suffered serious burns because he was using the microwave as a clothes drier. The microwave company is therefore not responsible for any injury he suffered as the result of his actions.
Because of lack of grounds for a lawsuit, the case would be dismissed.