1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Oksi-84 [34.3K]
2 years ago
11

The practice of counting slaves as fractional "persons" for representation in the house of representatives is known as the _____

compromise.
Social Studies
1 answer:
NISA [10]2 years ago
4 0
<span>This was the three-fifths compromise. It was a way for the southern states to remain on-board during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. By counting slaves for apportionment purposes, the southern states, with their much higher proportion of African persons, were able to keep a level of representation similar to that of the northern states.</span>
You might be interested in
How did the ancient cultures of Mesopotamia and Egypt develop into successful civilizations
balu736 [363]

The success of both would be strongly contributed to by a great deal of luck to begin with. This luck pertains to having the right conditions under which to produce the food and water necessary to support large civilizations and communities. The power and force to gain large areas of land to be drawn into the civilization. The power and force to keep control of neighboring captured and incorporated lands. The dedication of the people, normally gained by having the power and force to provide them with safe and contented lives without worry of invasion and destruction. Without such power and growing force (military) the civilization would have been a single community or oasis in the desert.  

Seeing that the fledgling civilization would survive, there was a need for accounting for all the food and supplies collected from the outer regions so they invented writing and a written record to keep track with. This forced organization and removed a great deal of chance related to luck and thus yielded a stronger and more powerful nation. With which more land could be conquered and absorbed into the realm of the nation.

7 0
3 years ago
Advocates of gay marriage argued that Section 2 of the federal Defense of Marriage Act, which stated that no state must accept a
AlladinOne [14]

Answer:

It violated the Equal Protection Clause.

Explanation:

In the text of the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution, the Equal Protection Clause forbids states from denying in its jurisdiction, any person, the equal protection of the laws. When section 2 of DOMA attempted to allow states the denial of recognition of marriages conducted in other states by same sex couples, it violated the Equal Protection Clause.

8 0
3 years ago
Describe two ways in which the laws protects citizens against human rights violations​
ch4aika [34]

Answer:

The law protects citizens against human right violations in the following ways:

1. Protection of Human Rights Act 1993: declares the rights pertaining to life, equality, liberty,and dignity of an individual that is guaranteed by the Constitution of India.

2. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)- declared by the United Nations General Assembly in the year 1948.

i found it in brainly

8 0
2 years ago
1 . The language of price controls Suppose that, in a competitive market without government regulations, the equilibrium price o
aalyn [17]

Your question is not properly arranged, which makes it difficult to be understood. Please let me assume your proper question to be this;

The language of price controls Suppose that, in a competitive market without government regulations, the equilibrium price of rental cars is $58 per day.

Complete the following table by indicating whether each of the statements is an example of a price ceiling or a price floor and whether it is binding or nonbinding.

Statement: Price Control, Binding or Not.

1. Due to new regulations, car-rental companies that would like to pay better wages in order to hire more workers are prohibited from doing so.

2. The government prohibits car-rental companies from renting out rental cars for more than $36 per day.

3. The government has instituted a legal minimum price of $87 per day for rental cars.

ANSWER: 1. The statement is a PRICE CEILING and BINDING.

2. The statement is a PRICE CEILING and NOT BINDING.

3. The statement is a PRICE FLOOR and BINDING.

EXPLANATION:

1. The statement is a PRICE CEILING and BINDING. This is a price ceiling, because the government has set a maximum limit that cannot be exceeded in payment of wages. This is binding because it is a regulation, that's means it has passed through the legal chambers before it was instituted.

2. The statement is a PRICE CEILING and NOT BINDING. This is a price ceiling because the government has set a maximum limit of $36 per day for car rental companies, and prohibit any company that rents out car above the set limit. This is not binding because it is a declaration by the government political activities, plans and intentions, which does not have a legal background. Therefore it can be easily changed by a new government.

3. The statement is a PRICE FLOOR and BINDING. This statement is a price floor because the government set a minimum limit or benchmark of price to be $87 per day. Therefore no company is required to sell below the limit. This is binding because it is legal, that means it has passed through the legal chambers before is was instituted.

A binding statement is a legal agreement between two parties, that helps to regulate their activities. For a statement to be binding it must be legally instituted.

Price ceiling is the maximum price a goods or services can be sold. This is set by the government or organization in other to regulate the selling of such goods or services.

Price floor is the minimum amount a dealer is willing to sell a goods or services. This is also set by the government, or the organization is other to regulate the price of the goods or services.

3 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP: After the French and Indian War, tension between Britain and the colonies:
timofeeve [1]
Britain’s debt from the French and Indian war led it to try to consolidate over its colonies and raise revenue through direct taxation generating tensions between Great Britain and its North American colonies.
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • _____ applies to laws that touch on the basic rights of a “suspect class.”
    10·2 answers
  • Which agency reports data on the trends in adult obesity in the united states?
    14·1 answer
  • How many times more powerful was the hydrogen bomb to thr atomic bomb?
    10·2 answers
  • Who eventually would protect Luther as he risked his life in standing up for the church?
    5·1 answer
  • How many million people is Tokyo, Japan home to?
    13·1 answer
  • Anna Papafragou and her colleagues (2008) found that, depending on the language they spoke, participants were more likely to foc
    7·1 answer
  • You show respect for another person by:
    11·2 answers
  • Brian has been diagnosed with bipolar disorder. One symptom he experiences during both his manic and depressive episodes is dist
    11·1 answer
  • What was the political condition of the Nepal valley during during the rule of Malles kings?​
    11·1 answer
  • How has the religious identity been maintained in nepal? discuss​
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!