Answer:
The correct answer is : one-to-one relationship
Explanation:
This case gives an example of a one-to-one relationship, which expresses one record in a set of information that is associated with one and only one record in another set. It happens when the information given can be linked with only one option in another table of information and vice versa. The element of one set is paired or matched with exactly one element of the other set.
'Although concrete operational thinkers might succeed on the balance-a-scale test of formal reasoning, they are less likely to do so because of their reliance on <u>trial and error</u>.
An operational definition is a definition that defines the precise way wherein a variable is measured. Giving the steps used in defining each variable allows others to evaluate and potentially mirror research take a look at.
Your operational definitions describe the variables you may use as indicators and the processes you will use to study or degree them. You need an operational definition due to the fact you can not measure something without one, regardless of how top your conceptual definition is probably.
An operational definition of a variable is the set of approaches used to measure or control it. a great operational definition is obviously sufficient so that an unbiased researcher ought to use the same technique (mirror the studies) and get identical outcomes.
Learn more about operational here brainly.com/question/1266027
#SPJ4
Answer:
Sugauli treaty was a treaty that defined the borders of Nepal after its expansion to other territories and conflicts with other countries aroused. It was established on the 2nd of December 1815.
Explanation:
The Sugauli treaty established the borders of Nepal after conflicts with the East India Company took place. Nepal and the East India Company signed a treaty that defined the limits of Nepal. As a consequence, Nepal lost some of its territories. The Sugauly treaty was signed on December 2, 1815, and ratified on March 4, 1816.
The capacity to read texts "by sight" is eventually supported by having this competence. This is the main reason that the ability to identify, segment, blend, and manipulate individual phonemes in spoken words is important for reading an alphabetic writing system. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is an alphabetic writing system?</h3>
Generally, It is common practice to make a distinction between alphabetic, syllabic, and logographic methods of writing (Gelb 1952). Therefore, alphabetic writing systems are instances of systems in which visual units correspond with phonemes. Some examples of alphabetic writing systems are the English, Italian, Russian, and Korean writing systems.
In conclusion, Eventually, possessing this competency will help one's ability to read written texts "by sight." Reading an alphabetic writing system requires one to have the capacity to recognize, separate, mix, and otherwise manipulate the different phonemes that make up spoken words. This is the primary reason for this need.
Read more about the alphabetic writing system
brainly.com/question/11905015
#SPJ1
