1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Studentka2010 [4]
3 years ago
14

How do the major parties select their candidates for president of the United States

History
1 answer:
DaniilM [7]3 years ago
3 0

In primaries, party members vote in a state election for the candidate they want to represent them in the general election. After the primaries and caucuses, each major party, Democrat and Republican, holds a national convention to select a Presidential nominee.

My deepest apologies if this is not what you meant.

You might be interested in
What were bad things john locke did? help i need this asap !!
Fantom [35]
Given his reputation as a defender of property rights and personal freedom, Locke has been accused of hypocrisy for his role in promoting and benefiting from slavery and the expropriation of indigenous populations, actions that would seem to contradict his philosophical position. This is too charitable.
6 0
2 years ago
What caused William the Conqueror to bring feudalism with him to England?
bija089 [108]

Answer:

Feudalism is the name given to the system of government William I introduced to England after he defeated Harold at the Battle of Hastings. Feudalism became a way of life in Medieval England and remained so for many centuries. William I is better known as William the Conqueror.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
According to the report, most deaths during civil war are due to:
strojnjashka [21]
<span>Most deaths in the Civil War were due to diseases that had nothing to do with combat.
Hope this helps! Please let me know if I'm wrong. :)</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Was the united state correct 1945 when it became the first nation to use atomic weapons against japan to end world war 2 or was
Dominik [7]

Answer:

It was a morally wrong decision to drop the atomic bombs.

Explanation:

This is a heavily debated opinion-based question where you can go both ways. In my personal opinion, I personally argue that it was morally wrong for the US to use atomic weapons on Japan. Below is my reasoning.

1. Japan had already expressed the desire to surrender previous to the dropping of the atomic bombs, meaning that they were not a military necessity.

Prior to the dropping of the atomic bombs, Japan had already expressed the desire to surrender under the single condition that their emperor would not be harmed. (This was mainly due to cultural reasons that made the emperor a particularly important figure) Instead of accepting, the United States instead decided to fight for unconditional surrender. While they did achieve that in the end, they ended up not harming the emperor anyway, meaning that they could have just accepted Japan's surrender in my personal opinion. Moreover, this desire disproves the argument that the decision to drop the bomb was a military necessity and many contribute Japan's surrender more so to the Soviet invasion of Manchuria which meant Japan now had to fight a two-front war.

2. Atomic weapons are a form of indiscriminite killing.

Atomic weapons don't have eyes. They can't tell the difference between the military and civilians. Thousands of women and children were killed that had no involvement in the war. It is a war crime to intentionally target civilians, so why would atomic weapons be ethically acceptable? While the US did drop leaflets to warn civilians prior to the attacks, this act is not enough, and it cannot be expected for millions to flee thier homes.

3. The government may have been considering diplomatic reasons rather than solely ending the war.

If the US was really after a speedy end to the end of the war, there could have been many other ways to go about it. They could have continued to firebomb cities or accept conditional surrender. Some have argued that the diplomatic effects that came with it such as scaring the Soviets and proving US dominance were also in policymakers' minds. If the US had not been victorious in World War II, several important members of the government would have likely been tried as war criminals.

The Counter Argument:

Of course, there is also a qualified opposing view when it comes to this. It is perfectly valid to argue that the bomb was necessary for ending the war: as it is impossible to know the "what ifs" had history not happened the way it did. It is undeniable that the atomic bomb likely saved thousands of American lives if the war would have continued, and the war did ultimately come to an end a couple of days after the atomic bombs. There also is not enough evidence as to what exactly was the reason the Japanese unconditionally surrendered: it could have been Manchuria or the atomic bomb, both, or even other reasons entirely. Lastly, the general public did approve of the bombings at the time.

In recent years, the public have slowly become more critical of the bombings, although it remains a weighted moral debate.

Note: These are my personal views and this does explicitly represent the views of anyone else. Please let me know if you have any questions :)

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Italy and Niger have opposite population demographics: Italy has an aging population with a high life expectancy, and Niger has
Nostrana [21]
This is true - Italy has a aging population which is expected to life long - as is the case with most post-industrial societies, while Niger on the other hand expects its people to live not as long and at the same time has a younger population.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • When this country became a communist nation in 1949 it increased the fears of the u.s.?
    8·1 answer
  • Name each branch of government and explain its primary job
    9·1 answer
  • Imagine that you in a boat, in the middle of the sea. Suddenly, you are surrounder by hungry sharks, to feed on you. how can you
    9·2 answers
  • What was Napoleon called when his escape from Elba was first reported?
    9·2 answers
  • What was the main effect of the event reported in this headline?
    5·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASE! CAN SOMEONE PLEASE GIVE ME A SHORT BIOGRAPHY OF CHARLES RICHARD DREW! I TRIED SEARCHING IT UP BUT IM CONFUSED! I WI
    15·1 answer
  • What began to trouble President Monroe?<br> IT'S DUE TOMORROW!!!!!!!!!!!!<br> PLZ HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!
    14·1 answer
  • What is the Industrial Revolution in the United States?
    5·2 answers
  • Why did the bear flag revolt happen ?
    5·1 answer
  • How did wars affect the city-sates of Greece ?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!