1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mariana [72]
3 years ago
8

Third parties have influenced some elections in U.S. history by doing which of the following?

History
2 answers:
OlgaM077 [116]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answer is Presenting positions that the major parties then adopt

Explanation: Because the Third Party system made some difference in the elections, by presenting the positions adopted in the major parties.

Nadusha1986 [10]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

I just took the quiz and the answer is presenting positions that the major parties then adopt.

You might be interested in
What was the goal of the Hundred Flowers Campaign?
nignag [31]
D. To grant more freedom of speech to some citizens
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Question 3 (5 points)
vagabundo [1.1K]
Monroe doctrine
Monroe doctrine warns European countries to not colonize or puppet monarch
8 0
3 years ago
What is the most common things people do out in the open?
Jobisdone [24]

raise hand in a friendly manner, wave, force a smile, nod and make eye contact for a split-second before purposefully making themselves busy with something else to avoid beginning conversation and real human connection and interaction

3 0
3 years ago
What is "the law of the land" at the state level?
Marianna [84]

Answer:

Primary tabs. The law of the land is the whole body of valid laws, statutory or otherwise, existing and in force in a country or jurisdiction at a particular date. Every valid statute is the “law of the land” with respect to its subject matter.

Explanation:

hope it's help you

MARK ME AS BRAINLIST...

PLEASE...

8 0
2 years ago
If a historian takes a source out of context, she is likely to:
DIA [1.3K]

Option A. If a historian takes a source out of context, she is likely to:

A. misunderstand the intended meaning of historical actions.

<h3>What does it mean to take things out of context?</h3>

This is used to refer to the fact that a person is taking what is being said outside of the meaning that the message is supposed to convey. It has to do with not being able to understand what is said and interpreting it accordingly.

In this situation, when the historian takes things out of their context, then it means that they would not understand the true meaning of the happenings of that period.

Read more on historical events here: brainly.com/question/17040564

#SPJ1

8 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • How did Henry ford affect the automobile industry
    5·1 answer
  • How do you best describe how the civil war came to an end?
    5·1 answer
  • Which industry would MOST LIKELY be found to be profitable in the area known as the Canadian Shield?
    5·2 answers
  • How is elevation shown on a topographic map?
    10·2 answers
  • Look at the graphic from Citizenship .Which statement best summarizes the central idea of both panels?
    10·2 answers
  • 2 Points
    7·2 answers
  • What did the Chinese make paper from?<br><br> Bamboo and eucalyptus <br> Bamboo and pine
    14·2 answers
  • Following the Glorious Revolution the document Know as____________________ ________________
    11·2 answers
  • pls help its about brainpop "Causes of the American Revolution" pls answers these questions plss no link. :)​
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following events happened LAST?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!