Answer:
Following the end of Reconstruction and the establishment of full citizenship for former slaves, many states started instituting laws that required separate public facilities, such as railroad compartments, for whites and African Americans.
In 1892, a man of mixed race, Homer Plessy, sat down in a whites-only compartment of a railroad car. He was arrested, and each level of the Louisiana court system found him guilty of violating the state’s segregation laws. The state supreme court, however, allowed Plessy’s case to go further in the appeal process.
The case was eventually heard by the US Supreme Court in 1896. The grounds for Plessy’s case rested on the assumption that segregation laws were unconstitutional on the basis of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
Take some of the hard to explain passages in the Bible (or some contradictions).
Those who have faith don't need to know what the passage means at all. They accept what is part of their faith as all that matters. If they don't understand something, they believe that if they leave it alone or pray about, eventually the meaning will become clear. And if it never does, then God will reveal it perhaps after death. It doesn't matter.
To someone without faith, the meaning will never be clear even if one is offered. They can't accept it because their understanding will not permit them to care about whatever it is that seems unclear. To them it does not matter because the premise that religion is built on is false. No answer can bridge that gap.
I hope I'm being fair to both sides. I have faith so if you get a better answer from those who do not, then their explanation is the one you should accept.
Answer:
Not until 1920 did women add the ballot to their arsenal of political tools. The women's rights movement was the offspring of abolition. Many people actively supported both reforms. Several participants in the 1848 First Women's Rights Convention in Seneca Falls had already labored in the anti-slavery movement.
The senate rejected Robert Bork
Answer: Few of his claims are supported by any real evidence.
Explanation: Give me the brainiest
