Here so the other guy gets brainiest :)
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, the correct response would be that </span><span>"Their crime </span><span>did not directly cause any deaths", since although it was clear both Rosenbergs were guilty of espionage, it's not certain that their deeds led directly to any personal harm</span>
<span>C. Northern Mexico.....I believe that's the answer. I could be wrong but I'm positive that's the correct answer.</span>
Populism never recovered from the failure of 1896. For example, Tennessee’s Populist Party was demoralized by a diminishing membership, and puzzled and split by the dilemma of whether to fight the state-level enemy (the Democrats) or the national foe (the Republicans and Wall Street<span>). By 1900 the People’s Party of Tennessee was a shadow of what it once was. so the answer maybe D</span>
Answer:
Strict constructionism is a legal theory applied in American law by means of which a restricted interpretation of the Constitution of the United States and the clauses, rights and prerogatives that it establishes in its articles is defended.
Thus, this position adopts a conservative interpretation of the constitutional text that, although it does not become textual, does restrict the possibility that the judges make analogies or another type of interpretation of an expansive nature on the precepts established in the Constitution.
