Answer:
1- McCulloch v. Maryland:
-The Second Bank of the United States was involved in the case.
-The Supreme Court ruled that a state could not tax a federal institution
2- Gibbons v. Ogden:
-The state of New York was involved in the case.
-The Supreme Court ruled that a state could not regulate commercial activities between states.
-A state-granted one company exclusive rights over the Hudson river.
Explanation:
1- McCulloch v. Maryland was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1819, in which the state of Maryland was barred from levying a tax on federal banks operating in its territory. As a result, the principle of federalism triumphed over state rights, while the constitutional "Necessary and Proper Clause," which allows Congress to carry out certain actions not expressly stated in the Constitution but that appear to conform with those permitted activities, remained in effect.
2- Gibbons v. Ogden was a Supreme Court decision from 1824 that upheld the federal government's authority to control interstate trade. This is due to a dispute between New York and New Jersey, which was supposed to be settled by municipal courts but ended up breaching the Supreme Court's original authority and the states' right to equality.
I’m going to go with the 3rd. Everyone knows(should know)the 1st, 2nd , 4th and 5th but it’s rare for people to know the 3rd without at least a reminder. It’s the one about not quartering soldiers in peace time. This is the least argued amendment. I don’t think it’s even been incorporated through the 14th since it doesn’t ever come up. All that being said, if it wasn’t there I bet we would all get new roommates.
these changes will be monitor with heart rate monitor and a weighing scale.
Explanation:
-the one and only kitkat
The Ottoman Turks began to rise in power the answer is B
