1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Arlecino [84]
3 years ago
13

What justification for punishment do you favor? Is it the one that you think "works" best in terms of preventing crime, or do yo

u favor it because it fits your ideology?
Law
1 answer:
Lelechka [254]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: The legitimate answer would be to prevent crimes.

Explanation: But in the United States of America, laws are created by politicians may choose ideology.

You might be interested in
7. A lane on a busy street that helps drivers make<br> safer mid-block left turns is called a
klasskru [66]

Answer:

Shared left turn lane

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
The __________ terms of a contract are those terms that would allow a court to determine what the damages would be in the event
Lynna [10]

Answer: Material

Explanation:

The material term are basically used to determined the significant problem in the breaches the contract like the damages in the quality and performance. In this, it is right the contractual part to sue for the contract breaches. The material terms are also referred in terms of the issue in price and quantity of the contract party.

7 0
3 years ago
How does the concept of strict product liability apply to this situation?
masha68 [24]
Strict Liability: Strict liability is where even if a product was safely designed, was properly manufactured, and contained an appropriate warning, a manufacturer or retailer of a product may be liable for injuries resulting from use of the product simply because the product caused those injuries.
8 0
3 years ago
I need 5 reasons against gun control laws
podryga [215]
Here are the reasons some use to go against gun control laws

1. Shooters target gun-free zones
2. No laws could have prevented the tragedy
3. Terrorists and criminals aren’t deterred by laws
4. Guns are just a tool, like knives and hammers
5. A good guy with a gun would have stopped it
8 0
3 years ago
According to "social disorganization theory," disorganized communities contribute to criminal behavior. "Labeling theory" argues
vodomira [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

The belief associated with social disorganization theory is that crimes often arise from society with destructive ecological conditions. Crime in itself is measured differently among societies. So crime rates are often linked and associated with some neighborhood because of their ecological characteristics. Weak housing, language barrier, unemployment, and other factors could affect the crime rate in certain societies depending on the law of that society.

"Labeling theory" argues that society labels those who do not fit the roles of law-abiding citizens because society sets up an acceptable behavior that is used as laid down rules for acceptable behavior. Deviance is any behavior that is good or bad depending on how it is socially constructed and considered as acceptable behaviors.

<em>Now, to the set of questions above:</em>

Do you think that society labels people from disorganized communities regardless of their involvement in crimes?

ANS:

Yes. Society views location as instrumental in influencing people's behavior. Since for instance, criminal behaviors are mostly learned behaviors, people from disorganized communities are generally considered capable of getting involved in illegal activities.

What problems could arise if society labels law-abiding citizens who belong to disorganized communities as "criminals"?

ANS:

1. Sometimes, the label given to someone could increase their tendencies for making mistakes.

2. It could impact their self-esteem.

3. It could make them start getting involved in crime.

4. It could affect their employment eligibility if they desire to seek employment out of their neighborhood.

5. It could affect how their peers see them and relate to them.

Would such citizens receive fair treatment and equal opportunities?

ANS:

NO. Since it is perceived that people of the same age group, language and other factors may share similar characteristics because they are in the same society, that would generally affect and limit opportunities and limit their fair treatment in the society.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What can care providers do to encourage good eating habits
    5·2 answers
  • What are the main duties of the Financial services regulation in health
    15·1 answer
  • Do you think that the members of Congress understand the issues that the average American faces? Explain why or why not.
    10·2 answers
  • HELP PLEAE<br><br> HOW PLAY AMOG US111
    9·2 answers
  • there is a case thats not from your state but it is mandatory auhority in your state, how is this possible
    11·1 answer
  • Help please I am giving 10 points
    15·2 answers
  • A demand for the elimination of the traditional divisions of power and labor between the
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following is not a basic concept of democracy?
    9·1 answer
  • What is the main characteristic pf a rubuttable presumption?​
    10·2 answers
  • Read the list of rights below. Draw a graphic organizer with two
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!