Answer:
No, none that I am aware of. In Shakespeare’s time, a tragedy meant that the main character falls from fortune to disaster, normally because of a flaw or fate. Obviously, other characters may be unharmed, or may even benefit from the protagonist’s downfall. I’m not writing to make fun of other posters, but we could as easily call the Matrix a tragedy because Agent Smith loses, or say that Titanic has a happy ending for coffin salesmen. Yes, Macduff or Fortinbras do well at the end of their plays, but they are not the protagonists.
For that reason, because a pre-modern tragedy definitionally means that the hero falls, and that’s what happens in Shakespeare’s plays, I’d say no. There are “problem” plays such as the Merchant of Venice, where the opposite happens—a comedy has a partly sad ending, with Shylock’s defeat—but again, it’s all in what the protagonist does, and Antonio (the merchant) wins at its close when his ships return
Answer:
I do believe so, although it has a much more literal rejuvenation.
Explanation:
The garden is a place to relax and refresh, as is Neverland. However, in Neverland you literally do not age, therefore it is quite a literal concept of rejuvenation.
<u>Answer:</u>
There is one secret and there is also the development of fear that the shock which her brother will get might kill her. At the same time, she still have hope that she might get her brother back and believes that her brother is alive out. She further believes that her brother has not left her. She also makes preparations believing that her brother will come back for her. This is the reason why she includes the reasons of the Seminoles history and their situation today.