Answer:
What are the disadvantages of a hybrid car?
They are not as environmentally friendly as plug-in hybrids or electric cars. ...
You may not get as many discounts or incentives. ...
Servicing and maintenance charges can be higher. ...
They aren't as powerful. ...
They are not exempt from tax.
Explanation:
hybrid cars tend to offer slightly better gas mileage in the city because the low speed and increased braking mean more electricity and less gas are needed to power the car
(B i think)
or
(c)
Please mark as brainliest
Answer:
Before Henry joined the army, he envisages fighting in grand battles and being swept away by their "sweep and fire" and because of this he wants to become a Greek or "Homeric" figure. He is dissuaded by his mother from joining the army but he goes against her wishes and enlists.
When he leaves for war, his mother goes contrary to his expectations and instead of convincing him to be a war hero, she gives him a simple advice.
She asks him to take care of himself and be careful and not be a rebel and fall into the group of bad soldiers. She tells him, "<em> don't know what else to tell yeh, Henry, excepting that yeh must never do no shirking, child, on my account. If so be a time comes when yeh have to be kilt or do a mean thing, why, Henry, don't think of anything cept what's right."</em>
From the quote above, his mother implores him to always do the right thing when he is faced with the opportunity to do wrong.
<span>From my point of view the work on the theme in Anglo-Saxon poetics got off on what I always thought was the wrong foot. What Francis Peabody Magoun, Jr., called a theme was not what either I or Parry meant by the term. His meaning, nevertheless, was to prevail and is found in Riedinger's Speculum article—not under that name, however, but as a "cluster" of motifs. [1] Yet could it be that that is as close to my theme as can be expected in Anglo-Saxon poetry? Let us examine the proposition, because those who have sought "theme" there seem to have been frustrated, as was, for example, Francelia Clark, who has investigated this subject thoroughly. [2]
</span>
Human beings have a tendency to perceive themselves as the center of the universe, despite centuries of studies showing that our homeland, Planet Earth, is just a small rock floating around a mediocre star. Many questions arise from this perspective. Is our planet special because of the perfect conditions for life (as we know it)? Is our species special because of the possibilities and knowledge we developed from this planet? From an outside perspective, are we different from the other water and light-based animals and plants that share the planet with us?
The answers may vary abruptly depending on the source of knowledge to base the answer. Science and religion usually dispute on which has the best explanation. The first wins by proof, the second wins by support. And this duality shows a lot about how human see themselves.
But how a black hole would see humans? Probably in a more scientific way, comparing to religion.
For a black hole, a human being would not be seen differently from a bear. A bear would not be seen differently from a tree. A tree would not be seen differently from a rock or a puddle.
We are all just groups of different atoms, organized in different molecules, making different forms, exchanging energy with other groups of atoms.
Many human beings have this notion of ourselves as organized atoms, but the main difference in our perspective from a black hole´s perspective, would be in acknowledging this spark of life that searches for purpose in the energy exchanges…
