The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Do you consider Bishop Eusebius’s account to be reliable?
No, really not.
The reason why because his account had created many controversies.
Eusebius has been known as the official historian of the church. He participated in the Council of Nice in 314, organized by Roman Emperor Constantine to revise the religious or historic documents that would end up being in the Bible.
So Eusebius based most of his comments on personal opinions and other historic document's interpretations. It is difficult to say that he did the proper research and had reliable sources. During the Nicea Council, a group of Bishops decided what documents had to be part of the Bible and which not, based on their own criteria. That is not a good indicator of the validity of the documents included, even less we can consider those as sacred.
Hi tae ;)
Chai Ling is a Chinese psychologist who was one of the student leaders in the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989; which ended with the massacre of hundreds of demonstrators by army troops and riot police!
Hope this helps chu
Have a great day ♡♡
Bartolomeu Dias was the first European to round the southern tip of Africa. He named it Cape of Storms, but King John later renamed it Cape of Good Hope.
It goes. Fewer. Increase. Raise Prices. Increase. More. Decrease.
I hope this helped!!! :D
P.S. I’m only a 7th grader.
He supported civil rights, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), wipes out military segregation and supports civil rights of all Americans. He was the first President to address the NAACP and to issue an executive order about civil rights.
