1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dusya [7]
3 years ago
14

HELP! Will give brainliest. Considering the last 400 years of history, was the Columbian Exchange mostly positive or negative fo

r Europe and for the Americas, and why? Use evidence to support your answer.
History
1 answer:
grigory [225]3 years ago
5 0
Though there were positive effects, the Columbian Exchange had a long-lasting negative impact. Considerably, the Colombian Exchange was an exchange of guns, germs, gold, and (religious) glory.
For generations, Christopher Columbus was considered a hero of American history. He and the European explorers that followed were credited with bringing civilization to a new land. Their discoveries provided a way for Europeans to leave the continent and make new lives for themselves. While the explorers were on a quest for gold and riches, they also sought to spread Christianity and European ideals. In their view, the peoples they encountered in the New World were uncivilized and ignorant. They brought European ideas and Western religion to the continent, leading to a mixing of cultures.
Christopher Columbus’s arrival in the Americas facilitated the exchange of plants, animals and new diseases.
Europeans did bring new technologies and animals such as horses, cattle, sheep, and goats. However, those improvements came at a high price. The conquistadors (Spanish invaders) destroyed religious temples, and they killed those who refused to convert. Guns traded to indigenous peoples also increased the death toll among tribes fighting amongst one another, especially in North America.
More than guns, the most devastating result of the Columbian Exchange was the spread of disease. In the years following European invasion, it is estimated that up to 95 percent of the Americas’ total population died. That’s approximately 19 million people. The native population was almost wiped out. The main cause of death was disease, such as smallpox. These diseases did not exist in the New World prior to the European’s arrival. Because the native peoples had no natural immunity, they became sick. Europeans were less affected by disease outbreaks because they had been exposed to the germs before when they worked with domesticated animals. There was also little understanding of disease and how to contain outbreaks. As a result, these diseases spread rapidly. Also, since there was very little understanding of disease, the Europeans thought the native peoples were weak and sickly. Huge numbers of the native populations were wiped out from diseases, which led to a big shortage of labor. In addition, native people knew the land and could often escape if they were forced to work. Europeans quickly realized that they could not build a workforce out of the native peoples. The Europeans needed manual labor for the agricultural enterprises they set up, so they turned to the African slave trade. Beginning in the 1500s, thousands upon thousands of enslaved Africans were shipped to the continent.
In fact, the majority of enslaved Africans ended up in the Caribbean, Central America, and South America (ultimately almost 12 million). Approximately 500,000 were shipped to North America. Current economic hardships and social injustices today can still be traced back to the period of European domination. For example, native populations all over the North American continent struggle with issues of poverty and lack of opportunities. While there are still some Incan, Mayan, Aztec, and Native American cultures that remain today, many continue to struggle some 500 years after Columbus.

I hope this helps! My father was a world history teacher, so I may have provided a little excess information, depending on what you have and have not covered in your studies of the Columbian Exchange. :)
You might be interested in
What was the two names for the south in the civil war
Tamiku [17]

Answer:

the Confederate States of America, and Dixie, a nod to the Mason-Dixon line.

Explanation:

6 0
4 years ago
What is one similarity between joint committees and conference committees?
IrinaVladis [17]
Both are made up of members from both houses of congress
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did the 'thumbs down' sign mean in Roman gladiator fights?
GuDViN [60]
Feed your opponents to lions.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
can anybody help me with this question "Compare and contrast the role of religion in people's lives in the Middle Ages and in th
Harman [31]

<em>To make a fair description of the role of religion in people’s lives from Middle Ages to 21st century you should consider a specific geographic region or society, because in many places it has not changed that much, while in some places Christianism or Buddhism has grown a lot becoming the main religion. Per example in places like Brazil they did not have Christianism in Middle Ages as the native people were not Christians at all until the colonization process, in 21st more than half of the population is Christian.</em>

<em>But in general if you look to Europe the role of religion has changed a lot regarding first conduct, in Middle Ages religion played a very important role in defining what was right and wrong, in terms of behavior and based it on religious beliefs. These beliefs also influenced and controlled science and knowledge, in 21st this role of ruling behavior has been substitute by the law, now the religion still has its view of sin and influence or guides people’s values but the law is not based on religion but in many other elements, so the law is based in most countries in a secular state, where the religion and the state are separated institutions. Also in Middle Ages the king or the government were seeming as a kind of representatives of God on Earth and had a close relationship with bishops and the popes, now they are elected by the nation's desires.</em>

<em>So briefly the main role of religion in peoples's lives from Middle Ages to 21st  differs in how religion relates to politics, science and law.</em>

4 0
3 years ago
The primary goal of the american government's imperialistic policies was
Anna35 [415]
The Primary Goal was Commercial Expansion.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • hurry quickkkkkkkkkk Luther did not support the peasant revolt of 1520 because he believed peasants should obey their lords true
    6·2 answers
  • How did Israel win the Six-Day War?
    15·1 answer
  • How might European religion later affect the settlement of North America?
    8·2 answers
  • How does oligarchy work?
    7·1 answer
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLEIST!!!
    8·1 answer
  • I'm really confused can someone help me ASAP
    6·1 answer
  • How did reconstruction change life for african americans?
    13·1 answer
  • What was the significance of the plane selections made by the terrorists on 9/11
    7·1 answer
  • What was the bigger contributor that made "akbar the great" ?
    7·1 answer
  • describe roosevelt tone as he speak about his outlook on the rest of the war by using textual evidence​
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!