Answer: Egyptians believed tombs would be the safest place in the kingdom and they also believed the dead enjoyed the materials in the afterlife
Explanation: Egyptians believed they would go to the afterlife but their body had to be preserved in order to go into the afterlife so with riches in the tomb they would go to the afterlife with all of the riches and would be in the afterlife rich like they were when they were alive
Answer:
In about 550, the Byzantine Empire stretched as far west as Spain. It reached as far north as northern Italy. parts of Greece and the Balkans
Explanation:
Answer:
To exercise freedom of their Christian faith.
Explanation:
England was one of the major Europeans that seek to colonize the New World otherwise known as America. Others include Spain, France, and the Netherlands.
However, originally the purpose of each of the European settlers was different. England or English people on one hand was initially seeking "to exercise freedom of their Christian faith."
This led to two groups coming from England known as Puritans and Pilgrims that settle down in North America.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, the correct response would be that </span><span>"Their crime </span><span>did not directly cause any deaths", since although it was clear both Rosenbergs were guilty of espionage, it's not certain that their deeds led directly to any personal harm</span>
Answer:
The three types of persuasive authority which judges may use in cases of first impression are higher, peers, or lower courts in the hierarchy, or from other jurisdictions.
Explanation:
A case of first impression is an issue where the parties disagree on what the applicable law is, and there is no prior binding authority, so that the matter has to be decided for the first time. A first impression case may be a first impression in only a particular jurisdiction.
By definition, a case of first impression cannot be decided by precedent. Since there is no precedent for the court to follow, the court uses the plain language and legislative history of any statute that must be interpreted, holdings of other jurisdictions, persuasive authority and analogies from prior rulings by other courts, commentaries and articles by legal scholars, and the court's own logic and sense of justice.
