Answer: Oh now I can answer, Its the fourth one ^^
So these debates are usually over virtue ethics (basically what you value, how you value things etc.). One debate is between the philosophy of utilitarianism and deontology (consequentialism vs means based). Social problems and issues are often times evaluated under particular values. For (a simple) ex. a utilitarian would value implementing a policy to save the most people whereas a deontologist wouldn’t look to save the most people if it meant infringing on the rights of the individual. So a utilitarian would care more about extinction then the most gruesome possible death of one person. Hope this helps!
Style is considered less important because all different styles can still make someone feel a similiar way. Substance is more important because art is about how it makes a person feel
Answer:
<u><em>I believe it is C.</em></u>
Explanation:
While it is important to see the faces and frontal body of the paintings as it would have been informative, they aren't the most likely. As for the first one, A is just false- this is because the paleolithic age came before the Neolithic age, I such they made paintings in caves as well. Therefor, it wasnt the first paintings of or by humans.
One could use the above process of elimination to find the answer, or you could simply find that the Neolithic age (or the New stone age) was the era when humans began the art of agriculture- growing their own food, settling down, making bigger "clans" or groups, and staying alive longer.
Hope this helped! Brainliest is always appreciated! :)
Have a great day!
~Mitsuna
Answer:
Yes!
Explanation:
Art critique is where you help someone approve others artwork!
You could do this be face to face, writeing a essay, or i dont know makeing a letter and putting in a glass bottle to float away in the sea cause you dont wanna tell your friend about how you actaully feel about their art-
Anyways hope this helps!
