All categories

3 years ago

In a multi party system parties must join together to form what kind of government

2 answers:

4 0

In a multi party system parties must join together to form Coalition government. A coalition government is a cabinet of a parliamentary government in which multiple political parties cooperate, reducing the dominance of any one party within that coalition. The usual reason for this arrangement is that no party on its own can achieve

denpristay [2]3 years ago

3 0

In a multi party system, parties must join together to form a coalition

You might be interested in

The US troops who fought in the Mexican-American War were primarily

yuradex [85]

Volunteer soldiers. In America, there are no enlisted men, only citizens willing to give up their lives for their country. But during a serious war, there can be soldiers being deployed against their will so that there are more soldiers to help during the war.

5 0

3 years ago

Colonists destroy cargo in boston harbor

timama [110]

What is your question?

6 0

3 years ago

What my projection is used primarily by ocean navigators

Anarel [89]

Answer:

One of the most famous map projections is the Mercator, created by a Flemish cartographer and geographer, Graduates Mercator in 1569. It became the standard map projection for nautical purposes because of its ability to represent lines of constant true direction.

6 0

2 years ago

Would you employ a policy of Containment in the world today? How would you ensure that your policy of Containment or Non Contain

borishaifa [10]

Given limited supplies of vaccines, antiviral drugs, and ventilators, non-pharmaceutical interventions are likely to dominate the public health response to any pandemic, at least in the near term. The six papers that make up this chapter describe scientific approaches to maximizing the benefits of quarantine and other nonpharmaceutical strategies for containing infectious disease as well as the legal and ethical considerations that should be taken into account when adopting such strategies. The authors of the first three papers raise a variety of legal and ethical concerns associated with behavioral approaches to disease containment and mitigation that must be addressed in the course of pandemic planning, and the last three papers describe the use of computer modeling for crafting disease containment strategies.

More specifically, the chapter’s first paper, by Lawrence Gostin and Benjamin Berkman of Georgetown University Law Center, presents an overview of the legal and ethical challenges that must be addressed in preparing for pandemic influenza. The authors observe that even interventions that are effective in a public health sense can have profound adverse consequences for civil liberties and economic status. They go on to identify several ethical and human rights concerns associated with behavioral interventions that would likely be used in a pandemic, and they discuss ways to minimize the social consequences of such interventions.

The next essay argues that although laws give decision makers certain powers in a pandemic, those decision makers must inevitably apply ethical tenets to decide if and how to use those powers because “law cannot anticipate the specifics of each public health emergency.” Workshop panelist James LeDuc of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and his co-authors present a set of ethical guidelines that should be employed in pandemic preparation and response. They also identify a range of legal issues relevant to social-distancing measures. If state and local governments are to reach an acceptable level of public health preparedness, the authors say, they must give systematic attention to the ethical and legal issues, and that preparedness should be tested, along with other public health measures, in pandemic preparation exercises.

LeDuc’s fellow panelist Victoria Sutton of Texas Tech University also considered the intersection of law and ethics in public health emergencies in general and in the specific case of pandemic influenza.

3 0

3 years ago

pleasssssee help

Vanyuwa [196]

2) the revision of the Articles of Confederation

The stated purpose of this convention was the revision of the Articles of Confederation.

100 of 100

3) Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

The Constitutional Convention (also known as the Philadelphia Convention) was to be held in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

4) May 25, 1787

On May 25, 1787, delegates from seven states had arrived and established a quorum.

5) William Jackson

The secretary, William Jackson, kept a record only of the official motions and votes of the convention.

6) They wanted peace with the other states

They wanted a government that was representative of the will of the people but would be structured in such a way that it would not collapse into mob rule.

They wanted a representative government that was divided into executive, legislative, and judicial branches

They knew that the nation needed a stronger central government, though they were not willing to give up the sovereignty and autonomy of their states.

The delegates of the Constitutional Convention had many things in common, despite being from different states and different sections of the country. They knew that the nation needed a stronger central government, though they were not willing to give up the sovereignty and autonomy of their states. They also wanted peace with the other states. They wanted a representative government that was divided into executive, legislative, and judicial branches. They also wanted a government that was representative of the will of the people but would be structured in such a way that it would not collapse into mob rule.

7) James Madison

Our best record of these events comes from James Madison, who kept careful notes.

8) The New Jersey Plan

The Virginia Plan

The first major business of the convention had to do with the plan for representation in a national legislature. These two separate plans were the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan.

9) Senate: Each state would be allowed one vote.

House of Representatives: Each state would be assigned a number of votes based upon its population.

The convention settled on a combination of both the Virginia plan and the new Jersey Plan, creating a House of Representatives with votes apportioned by population and a Senate in which each state is equally represented with one vote each.

10) Each slave was counted as three-fifths of a person for purposes of both representation and taxation.

11) The Congress was not allowed to place any tariff on the slave trade for twenty years. Although it seemed that the South had won, it gave abolitionists hope that the slave trade could be brought to an end by means of tariffs in a fairly short period of time.

The Congress was not allowed to place any tariff on the slave trade for a period of twenty years, or until 1808. This may not seem like a compromise, since the South's interests seem to have won. However, it gave abolitionists hope that the slave trade could be brought to an end by means of tariffs in a fairly short period of time.

12) The framers hoped to give the Constitution its best chance of being ratified by the states.

By voting unanimously, the framers hoped to give the Constitution its best chance of being ratified by the states.

13) Delegates met in Philadelphia to create the Constitution of the United States.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers